What I mean here is...
When it becomes hard to judge a fight, the judges will go with the more active fighter. In this case, the more active fighter will be Pacquiao. Now on top of this, I know Bob Arum is a shady character. He will shake hands, have dinner dates and throw some money around. In another words...bribery. Does Floyd Mayweather have to defeat Manny Pacquiao by knockout or a clear unanimous decision (as in, 12 rounds of pure dominance by Mayweather), to actually have his hand raised at the end of the fight? Because, if you include the boxing politics into the fight I feel like Floyd Mayweather is going to get screwed. For instance, if Oscar de la Hoya was part of Top Rank when he fought Mayweather and the fight was exactly the same, I have a feeling Oscar would have won due to Arum's "behind the scene" tactics.
When it becomes hard to judge a fight, the judges will go with the more active fighter. In this case, the more active fighter will be Pacquiao. Now on top of this, I know Bob Arum is a shady character. He will shake hands, have dinner dates and throw some money around. In another words...bribery. Does Floyd Mayweather have to defeat Manny Pacquiao by knockout or a clear unanimous decision (as in, 12 rounds of pure dominance by Mayweather), to actually have his hand raised at the end of the fight? Because, if you include the boxing politics into the fight I feel like Floyd Mayweather is going to get screwed. For instance, if Oscar de la Hoya was part of Top Rank when he fought Mayweather and the fight was exactly the same, I have a feeling Oscar would have won due to Arum's "behind the scene" tactics.
Comment