Compubox is not tht accurate. Quit using it to disect fights.

[Battle*Hardened]

It should hold no water in judging a fight for 3 reasons.

1. It's not that accurate.
2. Fights are scored by rounds not entire fights.
3. It doesn't judge effectiveness and clean/hard punches landed.

[ИATAS]

Wait, hold up! You're telling me two guys each with a clicker connected to a single laptop is not 100% accurate???

[Spray_resistant]

It should hold no water in judging a fight for 3 reasons.

1. It's not that accurate.
2. Fights are scored by rounds not entire fights.
3. It doesn't judge effectiveness and clean/hard punches landed.

[IMG]http://i1229.***********.com/albums/ee466/sprayresistant/558ad82a-a7f7-c220-467558.png[/IMG]

[Battle*Hardened]

Wait, hold up! You're telling me two guys each with a clicker connected to a single laptop is not 100% accurate???

That picture seals the deal on the point im trying to make.

[Battle*Hardened]

[IMG]http://i1229.***********.com/albums/ee466/sprayresistant/558ad82a-a7f7-c220-467558.png[/IMG]

Obvious to you maybe, but then why do so many people look into it so deeply?

[ИATAS]

If Compubox really wanted to be thorough and accurate they would re-watch the fights and re-count the punches.

[RespekonMyName]

Mayweather/Castillo I is a prime example. Castillo didn't land more shots, I don't care what anyone says.

[Spray_resistant]

Obvious to you maybe, but then why do so many people look into it so deeply?

Because they are nobheads who don't know the rules of boxing, compubox is just a tool used to reflect on what occurred in the fight nothing more.