Why is Roach very vocal about a Khan vs Mayweather fight?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • SWEETSCIENCE100
    Undisputed Champion
    • Jun 2011
    • 1032
    • 88
    • 0
    • 7,257

    #51
    Originally posted by SpitBalla
    Yes you're completely wrong as usual.

    The Prescott lose was due to khan being a teen with no muscles on his legs and too much on his upper body and arms, which made his hands slow, and his weak legs made him have a weak chin.

    Stop embarrassing yourself, you clearly have no idea what your talking about you dumb ass.
    Another idiot who pretends to know boxinglol. I guess That punch on Khans chin had nothing to do with him being knocked silly and cross eyed. lol your a joke lol if Judah lands on Khans chin the same **** will happen, khan has a glass jaw

    Comment

    • game20ver
      Interim Champion
      • Jul 2008
      • 530
      • 30
      • 0
      • 14,518

      #52
      Originally posted by Dedication
      Has he completely forgotten about Manny.

      Something's not right here.

      And it's been more than 10 days since WADA responded to Arum, and we're still yet to hear from him.
      This is what I am wondering as well. Pacquiao is his #1 fighter, Pacquiao/Mayweather is the #1 attraction in boxing. If Manny is not an option for Khan then why is Mayweather? Freddie should be demanding Floyd step up & take on his A fighter not his B. Especially with the money involved in a PAC/May fight.

      Comment

      Working...
      TOP