Stop saying f*ght hype dropped the konz story..ph*lboxing did

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Seleção No. 13
    Noblesse oblige
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Dec 2009
    • 5934
    • 280
    • 265
    • 12,426

    #21
    Originally posted by Check_hooks
    Fighthype also published a story about a unnamed Phillipino Pacquiao sparring partner who saw refused to give his name that saw Pac on PED at the Wildcard.

    Pac has never had a Phillipino sparring partner at the Wildcard.

    This isn't the first time they pull a story out their ass because they don't have any real news to report. Besides Floyd likes Popeyes.
    They didn't start that story but they sure as hell were spreading it around. You can tell their motives when they started up a twitter conversation about the story.
    Originally posted by Eastbay Giant
    The **** was also on MPboxing.com which is Manny's official website. So if your gonna call bull**** on Fighthype, make sure to do the same on "Team Pacquiao" as well.
    The rest of Team Pacquiao is anti-Koncz. Timothy James (who runs the site) hates Koncz to death.

    Comment

    • madsweeney
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jun 2009
      • 4551
      • 508
      • 298
      • 14,237

      #22
      Originally posted by DempseyRollin
      gtfo if u wanna pick and choose when those inadequacies are applied as if one site is that much better than the other when it comes to it, yea. and thats wat ur doing, picking and choosing.
      One site that I know of ran the Ellerbe firing non-story, the ex-filipino sparring partner non-story, and now this. I'm sorry but their credibility is shot to **** in my book. Sure its nit-picking but FFS they've proven many times that they don't follow up on ****. I don't read philboxing or examiner for the same reasons. I don't read bscene news for all that matter either.

      So much bull**** goes around none of these guys are believable but yet, everyone gets their crotches all wet whenever a "breaking news" story comes out and they all jump to conclusions. I'm not singling Fighthype, they just happen to be in the limelite in this conversation and lost my trust more recently than the others when they went from being more about reporting on matches and interviews to a boxing-tabloid.

      Comment

      • LupinIII
        Interim Champion
        • Jul 2010
        • 880
        • 41
        • 0
        • 7,036

        #23
        Originally posted by madsweeney
        One site that I know of ran the Ellerbe firing non-story, the ex-filipino sparring partner non-story, and now this. I'm sorry but their credibility is shot to **** in my book. Sure its nit-picking but FFS they've proven many times that they don't follow up on ****. I don't read philboxing or examiner for the same reasons. I don't read bscene news for all that matter either.

        So much bull**** goes around none of these guys are believable but yet, everyone gets their crotches all wet whenever a "breaking news" story comes out and they all jump to conclusions. I'm not singling Fighthype, they just happen to be in the limelite in this conversation and lost my trust more recently than the others when they went from being more about reporting on matches and interviews to a boxing-tabloid.
        what sites are credible then?

        i could pull bull**** stories from almost any big time news agency

        Comment

        • madsweeney
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jun 2009
          • 4551
          • 508
          • 298
          • 14,237

          #24
          Originally posted by Kenny MF Powers
          Thanks for the link, interesting development, if there's merit. Not holding my breath on it until **** is settled.

          Comment

          • madsweeney
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Jun 2009
            • 4551
            • 508
            • 298
            • 14,237

            #25
            Originally posted by LupinIII
            what sites are credible then?

            i could pull bull**** stories from almost any big time news agency
            Yea, all these media outlets are full of **** (and I don't mean just boxing sites) but people treat them as if its god speaking. This is the same reason I got out of following politics, its all spin and bs dressed up to be "journalism". Time and waiting for the details to come out (and confirmed) are the key to finding the truth. Unfortunately, people don't want to wait 30 seconds for a rumor, let alone spend the time and energy to see if its actually true.

            Comment

            • brick wall
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Feb 2008
              • 6480
              • 259
              • 35
              • 24,574

              #26
              lots of fighthype nuthuggers on this forum lol

              Comment

              • Dedication
                Banned
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Jun 2011
                • 1668
                • 113
                • 17
                • 2,375

                #27
                I hope Manny leaves Top Rank

                Comment

                • megas30
                  Greatness!!
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Nov 2009
                  • 7132
                  • 957
                  • 368
                  • 78,442

                  #28
                  If you guys have any reading comprehension you guys would have seen the title of the story had a question mark, which means fighthype were merely try to evaluate the truthfulness of the story. And if you read the story they were merely asking questions and stating possibilities.

                  Comment

                  • tesla_power
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Jun 2009
                    • 2050
                    • 66
                    • 87
                    • 8,744

                    #29
                    Aw come on, both sites leaves much to be desired. Every site has bias but those 2 are probably on par with each other with the difference being the fighter they support.

                    A lot of people in the PI including writers dislike Koncz so this not that unexpected. Plus, I don't think this is much a story anyway. The publicity team was probably just working overtime. Lolz.

                    Comment

                    • Travdog
                      Contender
                      • Nov 2009
                      • 439
                      • 27
                      • 21
                      • 6,523

                      #30
                      Originally posted by megas30
                      If you guys have any reading comprehension you guys would have seen the title of the story had a question mark, which means fighthype were merely try to evaluate the truthfulness of the story. And if you read the story they were merely asking questions and stating possibilities.
                      I was just about to post that

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP