How often do boxers bounce back from devastating losses?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Cleaver
    Contender
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Jul 2011
    • 302
    • 16
    • 5
    • 6,711

    #1

    How often do boxers bounce back from devastating losses?

    Hi guys, this is my first posted thread. I don't consider myself any type of boxing expert, just a fan and student of the game.

    I'm looking for betting value on the Murray/Mitchell domestic dust up this weekend, and after studying their professional records, all the youtube fights I could find, considering their styles, and avoiding all pre hype buildup, the only sticking point I can find (not based on who I think will win, but betting value) is whether Mitchell has recovered from what must have been a loss of confidence from the Katsidis blowout at Upton.

    As an experienced gambler in other betting fields, the price of 6/1 for Mitchell when compared to 11/8 for Murray for the KO/TKO/DQ seems far too big of a gap given their KO records.

    To my point

    How much of an effect (in boxing terms) do these devastating losses have on these fighters, and do they tend to do well when they don't take tuneup fights? Khan took on ***an for confidence, as I felt Hatton did with Lazcano, before they went on to fight tougher opponents. But on the flipside De La Hoya took on Mayorga after Hopkins.

    Is Khan the modern day exception to bounce back so well from a brutal KO? I don't have a good enough knowledge of the global boxing scene to make an educated opinion on it, so I leave it in your expert hands
  • JDezi4
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jul 2010
    • 3822
    • 95
    • 194
    • 10,052

    #2
    Victor Ortiz is the best of recent years. Assuming he learned his lesson, and will no longer back up and try (and fail) to box.

    Its not too common, mainly becuz a lot of fighters (especially as of late) were really just overhyped to begin with

    Oh, KHAN... forgot about him. He's probably the best example

    Comment

    • jri9d0
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • May 2009
      • 5107
      • 190
      • 0
      • 12,323

      #3
      Honestly man that’s hard to answer, it really depends on the fighters themselves. Pac early in his career has been KO’d and bounced backed remarkably, Fernando Vargas on the other hand was ruined after Tito!

      Comment

      • Medved
        Oh Mah Gawd!
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Aug 2010
        • 23633
        • 757
        • 323
        • 30,849

        #4
        Kevin Mitchell Opponents Records: 429 Wins - 341 loses = 20.50% Winning %
        He has 13 Wins against guys with LOSING records.

        John Murray Opponents Records: 446 Wins - 682 Loses = -52.9% Winning % (LOL more like losing %)

        12 Wins against guys with losing records.

        So if you getting 6 to 1 odds that Mitchell will win? Those are great odds, this fight should be a 50/50 fight, both their records are complete crap but the Loss on Mitchell's record is better than anything on Murray's

        Comment

        • BostonGuy
          Emeritus Champion
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Feb 2008
          • 13343
          • 2,119
          • 6,833
          • 900,690,265

          #5
          Sometimes a loss is a good thing for a fighter. It humbles them, and forces them to focus on their flaws. Wladimir Klitschko comes to mind. He had back to back devastating KO losses and he had to do some introspection but ultimately he bounced back and now he's damn near unbeatable. He rededicated and reinvented himself..

          Comment

          • Ogecca MaMa
            Captain Gym
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Mar 2009
            • 3537
            • 410
            • 1,364
            • 48,169

            #6
            Originally posted by JDezi4
            Victor Ortiz is the best of recent years. Assuming he learned his lesson, and will no longer back up and try (and fail) to box.

            Comment

            • Cleaver
              Contender
              Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
              • Jul 2011
              • 302
              • 16
              • 5
              • 6,711

              #7
              Cheers for the responses lads, totally overlooked Klitschko and Ortiz (I've watched the HBO highlights of the latter, and it seems like he's been in some wars).

              Originally posted by Medved
              So if you getting 6 to 1 odds that Mitchell will win? Those are great odds, this fight should be a 50/50 fight, both their records are complete crap but the Loss on Mitchell's record is better than anything on Murray's
              Not exactly, the 6/1 odds are on the KO/TKO/DQ, so if its going to points it would be a losing bet, the best I've found on the high street bookies in England for a Decision win (Mitchell) is 7/2. Looking at both their records (and I know these fighters come up against some crap early in their career), Mitchell has the higher KO count (23) to Murray's 18. So that price of 6/1 seems like it should be closer to 3/1-7/2, whether it pays off is irrelevant, key to ******** is to look for value and bet accordingly.

              My strategy in betting is to heavily study a market and look for genuine value, so theoretically in the long run you win because you find the best prices. And I have been pulling a very good profit when sticking to these rules!

              Comment

              • Medved
                Oh Mah Gawd!
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Aug 2010
                • 23633
                • 757
                • 323
                • 30,849

                #8
                Originally posted by Cleaver
                Cheers for the responses lads, totally overlooked Klitschko and Ortiz (I've watched the HBO highlights of the latter, and it seems like he's been in some wars).



                Not exactly, the 6/1 odds are on the KO/TKO/DQ, so if its going to points it would be a losing bet, the best I've found on the high street bookies in England for a Decision win (Mitchell) is 7/2. Looking at both their records (and I know these fighters come up against some crap early in their career), Mitchell has the higher KO count (23) to Murray's 18. So that price of 6/1 seems like it should be closer to 3/1-7/2, whether it pays off is irrelevant, key to ******** is to look for value and bet accordingly.

                My strategy in betting is to heavily study a market and look for genuine value, so theoretically in the long run you win because you find the best prices. And I have been pulling a very good profit when sticking to these rules!
                You missed 2 weeks ago when some UK Bookies had Haye and Wlad as 50/50 when Wlad shouldve been 6/1 , lots of ppl made money off that bet.

                Mitchell has only 1 Decision win in his last 10 fights. Rest have been KO.

                I dont know how good Murrays chin is, I would avoid this fight but if I had say $100 to bet I would do 75$ Mitchell straight up win and 25$ Mitchell by KO

                Comment

                • Cleaver
                  Contender
                  Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                  • Jul 2011
                  • 302
                  • 16
                  • 5
                  • 6,711

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Medved
                  You missed 2 weeks ago when some UK Bookies had Haye and Wlad as 50/50 when Wlad shouldve been 6/1 , lots of ppl made money off that bet.

                  Mitchell has only 1 Decision win in his last 10 fights. Rest have been KO.

                  I dont know how good Murrays chin is, I would avoid this fight but if I had say $100 to bet I would do 75$ Mitchell straight up win and 25$ Mitchell by KO
                  A good mate of mine strongly tipped Wlad on points for months, he had at least £200 on (that we knew about) at around 5/1 on the net, he surmised that based on looking at the cold facts, instead of being seduced by all the rubbish spouted before the fight. So whilst all the drunks were flying in the bookies to bet on Haye round 4,5 and 6, he saw the value.

                  Good points made there! Agreed.

                  Comment

                  • revs1227
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Jul 2007
                    • 8040
                    • 255
                    • 279
                    • 15,341

                    #10
                    i think it depends where theyre at in ther career i.e hatton vargas late in their careers harder to accept defeat ad bounce back ..pac ortiz ,kahn all earlier gainst lesser opponents ..better chance of bouncing back

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP