... Respected boxing journalist Claude Abrams gave over his editorial in this week's Boxing News to the subject of Roy.
I don't have an exact quote for the title of this thread, because Abrams himself reported that bit rather than give a quote (In Abrams write-up: "He said Tarver and Johnson were the fighters who were missing during his peak years, as though he was claiming that while he was No.1 he experienced a lack of strenuous competition. But the fact is Jones four or five years ago was vastly more skilled and able than he is today, although he insisted that Tarver would have posed him a problem at any stage of his career.")
Okay, some exact quotes from Roy in the piece:
"I felt like Saturday could have been the beginning of a new day. I felt good in the ring for a while. It's become fun again."
"I was satisfied with my performance. I realised I lost. But I'm not a fighter like Johnson that can brawl and that's the way you have to fight to beat Tarver. I can come back and be who I was. Nobody else can beat me but Tarver. Why? Because God has blessed me with talent."
Wait... Roy Jones suggests that his level of competition in the 90s wasn't THAT competitive, that he would have struggled against Tarver even IN his prime, and that Tarver is the man who he can't beat?"
The only conclusion I can come to is that Roy Jones must be a Brit noob hater.
I don't have an exact quote for the title of this thread, because Abrams himself reported that bit rather than give a quote (In Abrams write-up: "He said Tarver and Johnson were the fighters who were missing during his peak years, as though he was claiming that while he was No.1 he experienced a lack of strenuous competition. But the fact is Jones four or five years ago was vastly more skilled and able than he is today, although he insisted that Tarver would have posed him a problem at any stage of his career.")
Okay, some exact quotes from Roy in the piece:
"I felt like Saturday could have been the beginning of a new day. I felt good in the ring for a while. It's become fun again."
"I was satisfied with my performance. I realised I lost. But I'm not a fighter like Johnson that can brawl and that's the way you have to fight to beat Tarver. I can come back and be who I was. Nobody else can beat me but Tarver. Why? Because God has blessed me with talent."
Wait... Roy Jones suggests that his level of competition in the 90s wasn't THAT competitive, that he would have struggled against Tarver even IN his prime, and that Tarver is the man who he can't beat?"
The only conclusion I can come to is that Roy Jones must be a Brit noob hater.
It is... I'm bored, what can I say?
)
Comment