This is not even debatable it’s easily Floyd vs. Oscar. The mag pac fought was coming off almost two years layoff and the biggest loss of his career to be honest magarito was just never that good period.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
YOUR OPINION WANTED: More Impressive Win?
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Chadmazing View PostMayweather possibly had loaded gloves and possibly drugged his opponents. My proof is that you can't prove it's not possible! ******ed.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Chadmazing View PostFloyd knows exactly what his actions state. He knows Manny Pacquiao could beat him.
No other fighter in history has refused to fight a guy because he's so good he must be cheating yet is also sure he would win against said fighter accused of being so good it can't be real.
Comment
-
Originally posted by k1llu View PostThis is not even debatable it’s easily Floyd vs. Oscar. The mag pac fought was coming off almost two years layoff and the biggest loss of his career to be honest magarito was just never that good period.
Therefore, if you're built to throw bombs for 12 rounds, and can sustain his slow, sluggish style of offense, you can outwork him. Heck, Paul Williams won a very narrow UD over him 7-5, IMO. It was extremely close, but I thought it was justified.
And we are now seeing what Williams is made of. Maybe Margarito just wasn't all he was cracked up to be. I mean, his best win is over Cotto, and there's a huge cloud of speculation over that fight.
Comment
-
Truthfully, neither fight meant more. Both fights went the way the were expected to. Nothing beyond the norm really took place. One fight was dominated a bit more, with Manny beating the hell out of Margarito. However, Mayweather didn't get hurt to the body, and because he took less risk, looked less dominant.
So, in truth, they meant about the same and that's all there is to it. One was worth more money, but I couldn't give a **** about that.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Radke View PostMan thats the fight i always wanted to see.
Oscar doesn't have the fire in him anymore, so that's most likely will be the case.
I could just see the buildup now, 38 year old "Golden Boy", "chicano" against the "Tijuana Tornado" in a battle of washed-up has beens, LIVE ON HBO PPV. Contact your local PPV PROVIDER.
Said "dream" matchups buyrate 500,000 idiots pay for garbage. HAHAHA.
I mean, ****, we had BHOP vs. RJJ in a battle of fossils. HAHAHAHA.
Comment
-
Originally posted by THe TRiNiTY View PostSo, in truth, they meant about the same and that's all there is to it. One was worth more money, but I couldn't give a **** about that.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Squizz View PostHoly cow dude, I'm trying as hard as possible to objective here, and you're getting all defensive. It was an EXCELLENT win for Pacquiao, no doubt. But to say it was CLEARLY a better win than Floyd's win over Oscar, I feel is not fair. Tony was a shell of his former self in that fight. He'd been through wars with Mosely and Cotto in the prior few years, and not to mention, he's not exactly defensively savvy to begin with. Factor in the obvious struggle to make weight, and it's a miracle he was as active as he was. By all means, he should have been even MORE of a punching bag than he was. Packing on all that weight over night makes a fighter EXTREMELY sluggish.
Considering that Margarito would beat that Oscar - yes, it's a better win.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Radke View PostMan thats the fight i always wanted to see.
Oscar doesn't have the fire in him anymore, so that's most likely will be the case.
As older Junior Middleweights, Oscar can't stay away and takes a beating late in the fight.
Comment
Comment