Statement by NJSACB Commissioner on Lara-Williams Suspensions

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • CubanGuyNYC
    Latin From Manhattan
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Sep 2009
    • 15414
    • 1,678
    • 1,706
    • 112,127

    #1

    Statement by NJSACB Commissioner on Lara-Williams Suspensions

    The following are excerpts from an article by ESPN's Dan Rafael, regarding the recent suspensions of the judges in the Lara-Williams fight:

    In a letter obtained by ESPN.com, New Jersey commissioner Aaron M. Davis wrote to Lara promoter Dave Itskowitch of Golden Boy Promotions and Williams' promoter Dan Goossen informing them of the decision, which came after a video review of the fight with the judges.

    "The New Jersey State Athletic Control Board was responsible for assigning all three judges who scored this contest and decided the outcome," Davis wrote in the letter. "At the conclusion of the contest, this agency had concerns about the final scores. Due to these concerns we decided to conduct a full review of the scoring.

    "As part of this review, the NJSACB called in all three judges to our Trenton offices and conducted a full analysis of the scoring of each round."

    Davis said that the review of the fight was complete and the NJSACB "has not found any evidence of bias, fraud, corruption or incapacity on the part of any of the judges. However, we remain unsatisfied with the scoring of the contest even after hearing the explanations from the judges.

    "The NJSACB does not have the legal authority under these circumstances to invalidate the official result. This is due to the fact that all scoring is a matter of subjective judgment. In a similar fashion we cannot mandate a rematch. However, our opinion is that a rematch may be warranted.

    "This agency has placed all three judges on indefinite suspension. Further, all three judges will be required to undergo additional training prior to their return to professional boxing judging."

    Davis went further in apologizing for the lackluster judging.

    "Any contestant who enters a ring or cage in our state deserves the best officiating that we can provide," Davis wrote. "While we do not mean to diminish Mr. Williams' competitive spirit and exciting style, we feel that we did not provide our best officiating on July 9. Because we have a rich history of boxing and combat sports in New Jersey, we aspire to consistently improve in our officiating and strive to learn from this situation. We have no further comment on this matter at the current time."


    Wow....
  • Medved
    Oh Mah Gawd!
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Aug 2010
    • 23633
    • 757
    • 323
    • 30,849

    #2
    So basically, we know our judges messed up and we cant prove they took a bribe but tough luck and we cant do anything.

    Comment

    • Larry the boss
      EDUCATED
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jan 2011
      • 90798
      • 6,419
      • 4,473
      • 2,500,480

      #3
      Originally posted by Medved
      So basically, we know our judges messed up and we cant prove they took a bribe but tough luck and we cant do anything.
      yep....................

      Comment

      • CubanGuyNYC
        Latin From Manhattan
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Sep 2009
        • 15414
        • 1,678
        • 1,706
        • 112,127

        #4
        "As part of this review, the NJSACB called in all three judges to our Trenton offices and conducted a full analysis of the scoring of each round."

        Davis said that the review of the fight was complete and the NJSACB "has not found any evidence of bias, fraud, corruption or incapacity on the part of any of the judges. However, we remain unsatisfied with the scoring of the contest even after hearing the explanations from the judges."


        I love how they had the "Three Stooges" come into NJSACB offices and watch the entire fight, then explain how they came to the scores they recorded. What I would give to be a fly on that wall.... "I know Paul wasn't landing as much, or as effectively, but he was just busier." or " What's 'effective aggression'?" Incompetents....

        Comment

        • UglyPug
          Banned
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Jun 2010
          • 9561
          • 403
          • 159
          • 13,951

          #5
          excellent post and nice find man; that sounds about like what i expected them to say. . . Disappointing that they don't have the authority to take that L off Lara's record. Basically no proactive measure will be taken to ensure travesties don't continue to happen.

          The way boxing works, mischief is bound to be rampant.

          They can discriminate between "subjective scoring", and just flat out WRONG scoring. i would have LOVED to hear the judges explanation for scoring so many rounds to williams. . .

          Comment

          Working...
          TOP