14-day blood testing cut-off is more than enough...

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • tatangb45
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jun 2011
    • 1161
    • 32
    • 0
    • 7,254

    #1

    14-day blood testing cut-off is more than enough...

    It appears that, all along, people have been misinterpreting the context of the random blood testing issue. Based on the statements of USADA's Travis Tygart and Dr. Caitlin of the Non-profit Anti-doping Research, a 14-day blood testing cut-off with urine testing up to the fight, would have been more than enough AS LONG AS THERE IS AN OPTION TO BLOOD TEST FURTHER IF THEY FIND SOME ANOMALY IN THE URINE TEST.

    Actually, Dr. Caitlin was very specific on the the number of days of no testing where an individual could not be caught, and that is a 24-day window. This conforms exactly to Tygart's statement when he said, regarding his decision to stop blood testing 18 days prior to the fight, that they didn't need any further test. The rest of the random tests would be done through urine testing and another blood test right after the fight. However, if some anomaly in the urine test suddenly appeared, they would get another blood sample. But the urine tests did not uncover anything that could be questionable so they decided to end the blood test.
    To summarize; a 14 day or even a 20-day cut-off would have been sufficient so long as both fighters are made aware that further blood testing would be done if they discover any anomaly in the urine test. The continued urine test up to the fight would simply insure that neither fighter would try to cheat inside the 24-day window.
  • Pacquiao'd
    Banned
    • Mar 2010
    • 11948
    • 612
    • 153
    • 12,591

    #2
    too bad pacroid didnt accept it after he asked for it. so back to no cut offs we go

    your thread fails

    Comment

    • Alibata
      Dugong Maharlika
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • May 2004
      • 9047
      • 280
      • 33
      • 16,053

      #3
      mOST FANS, MEDIA, ETC TURNED AGAINST FLOYD BECAUSE THEY THOUGHT IT WAS ENOUGH... NOW THAT PAC HAS EVEN GONE FURTHER TO CONCEDE TO FLOYD, IT JUST ICING ON THE CAKE IF FLOYD COMES UP WITH ANOTHER OBSTACLE, IT JUST ADS MORE TO WHAT PEOPLE ALREADY THINK.

      Comment

      • tatangb45
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Jun 2011
        • 1161
        • 32
        • 0
        • 7,254

        #4
        Originally posted by yesir
        too bad pacroid didnt accept it after he asked for it. so back to no cut offs we go

        your thread fails
        So it boils down to "because Floyd says so".

        Comment

        • Carpe Diem
          Seize the day
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Jan 2010
          • 16023
          • 1,232
          • 996
          • 44,413

          #5
          Of course it is. But it should be up to the drug testing agency to decide it, not the Boxers.

          Comment

          • Larry the boss
            EDUCATED
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Jan 2011
            • 90798
            • 6,419
            • 4,473
            • 2,500,480

            #6
            **** all drug testing who cares if soeone is juicing

            Comment

            • Ko King 212
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Nov 2010
              • 2377
              • 97
              • 19
              • 8,702

              #7
              If it was enough they would have toke the f-ckin fight in march of 2010.

              Comment

              • tatangb45
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Jun 2011
                • 1161
                • 32
                • 0
                • 7,254

                #8
                Not sure if some of the responders are still having some difficulty in grasping what this thread is trying to get across. So here is another attempt to explain it further.
                There is a big difference between a blanket statement saying that blood testing can be done at anytime without notice, up to the fight, as against, blood testing will be done anytime up to 14 or 20 days prior to the fight but, with the option to take additional blood test if there is an anomaly found in the urine test which will be done anytime up to the fight.

                Comment

                • Baracka Flocka
                  Formerly Word2ThaFive
                  Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                  • Nov 2007
                  • 980
                  • 38
                  • 30
                  • 7,482

                  #9
                  Who needs testing. I can care less if my favorite fighter may be juicing. I don't even want know if they're clean or not. I rather them not get caught, it would hurt my feelings along with another part of my body too much.

                  Comment

                  • LupinIII
                    Interim Champion
                    • Jul 2010
                    • 880
                    • 41
                    • 0
                    • 7,036

                    #10
                    Originally posted by tatangb45
                    So it boils down to "because Floyd says so".
                    yes floyd is his daddy

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP