Comments Thread For: Arum: We Would Use WADA For Mayweather-Pacquiao

[V.WEBB]

Wess, don't be a fool. Did you NOT read that Mayweather on Saturday backed off of USADA and other items of testing were agreed to a while back????

That was from two years ago.

[Boxingtech718v2]

So know we know what the real reason why they don't like USADA, its because Tygart ruggled too many feathers over with the NSAC. Well as long as WADA assigns some other agency that is just as good then whatever. No more excuses Floyd.

[IMDAZED]

So know we know what the real reason why they don't like USADA, its because Tygart ruggled too many feathers over with the NSAC. Well as long as WADA assigns some other agency that is just as good then whatever. No more excuses Floyd.

And what does that have to do with Top Rank?

[Battle*Hardened]

This is very reasonable, but only if they have Wada assign an agency from neithers home country.

[WESS]

Wess, don't be a fool. Did you NOT read that Mayweather on Saturday backed off of USADA and other items of testing were agreed to a while back????

Bob calling the USADA "biased" never came up in the first round of negotiations or the notorious 2nd round.... Bob exposed who's holding the fight up yet again.

Floyd is saying take the test.... any test.... as long as it is random. Now we get Bob calling the USADA biased, They should take him to court.

I really feel for the pacterds. Bob should apologize for lying to them...

[LupinIII]

What is Arum gonna say when WADA backs the USADA?

[| THE KING |]

Just want to see the fight.. Let's see money back up that big boy talk.

[pistol whip]

What is Arum gonna say when WADA backs the USADA?

The WADA can assign anybody they want who is part of their orginization and yes the USDA is part according to the WADA website. But if they don't use the USDA it doesnt mean that who they use is any less crediable.

But of cours *****s will cry like children if the USDA isn't appointed. They need an excuse one way or another.

[pistol whip]

The WADA also has reprasentatives located here in the USA and they are in office from USA(WADA Foundation Board Member) January 1, 2009 – December 31, 2011.

[LupinIII]

The WADA can assign anybody they want who is part of their orginization and yes the USDA is part according to the WADA website. But if they don't use the USDA it doesnt mean that who they use is any less crediable.

But of cours *****s will cry like children if the USDA isn't appointed. They need an excuse one way or another.

i dont expect wada to come out and say yeah the USADA is biased and not able to handle the test. They will most likely back the USADA on this.