WADA makes the rules....

[skillswin]

*******s in damage dontrol mode

[Boxingtech718v2]

*******s in damage dontrol mode

They can keep posting their opinions, I've provided backed up facts.

[Manny#1ATG]

I think the *******s have given up on these threads after being so unmercifully slaughtered for the last 3 days.

[Leohappy]

It about not being bias towards certain athletics, through national association. And ask yourself for reason why WADA was brought in if it was "under WADA rules". Why the need?

to make it short,
because the french ADA complained to wada that uci was doing something ****ty/irregular. so they brought in WADA to inspect.
but this is something completely different. boxing has no UCI to begin with.

[ThePrince]

One key that you pigeons are overlooking- USADA/WADA/IOC have no jurisdiction or authority over professional boxing. So the fact that USADA even works for Floyd in his fights is a violation of US Congressional edicts (USADA only has authority over Olympics, Paralympics, and Pan American Games) and the IOC's own charter.

You keep copying and pasting the rules, regulations, etc of WADA or USADA... now show me where it says either has the authority to oversee Professional Boxing matches. All Arum is saying is- we'll do random, unlimited drug testing but it should be through a governing body that has actual authority over the fight like oh I don't know... the Nevada commission. This would be done with WADA oversight so it would be in league with their International anti-doping code.

I did this before and I didn't get an answer. I simplified the whole thing for the airheads having a hard time grasping a basic question:

Scenario 1: USADA conducts testing for a Professional Boxing Match.
Scenario 2: NSAC conducts testing for a Professional Boxing Match (With WADA/IOC oversight)

Question 1: What happens if a fighter in Scenario 1 refuses drug testing?
Question 2: Whatt happens if a fighter in Scenario 1 fails a drug test?

Once you answer those questions, replace Scenario 1 with Scenario 2 and answer them again.

Then tell me which scenario makes more sense or is more effective.

[Alibata]

One key that you pigeons are overlooking- USADA/WADA/IOC have no jurisdiction or authority over professional boxing. So the fact that USADA even works for Floyd in his fights is a violation of US Congressional edicts (USADA only has authority over Olympics, Paralympics, and Pan American Games) and the IOC's own charter.

You keep copying and pasting the rules, regulations, etc of WADA or USADA... now show me where it says either has the authority to oversee Professional Boxing matches. All Arum is saying is- we'll do random, unlimited drug testing but it should be through a governing body that has actual authority over the fight like oh I don't know... the Nevada commission. This would be done with WADA oversight so it would be in league with their International anti-doping code.

I did this before and I didn't get an answer. I simplified the whole thing for the airheads having a hard time grasping a basic question:

Scenario 1: USADA conducts testing for a Professional Boxing Match.
Scenario 2: NSAC conducts testing for a Professional Boxing Match (With WADA/IOC oversight)

Question 1: What happens if a fighter in Scenario 1 refuses drug testing?
Question 2: Whatt happens if a fighter in Scenario 1 fails a drug test?

Once you answer those questions, replace Scenario 1 with Scenario 2 and answer them again.

Then tell me which scenario makes more sense or is more effective.

One post to own em all... *****s are dumb, they won't get it. It is much easier and fun to mess around with them rather then take em serious.

[J-A-D-AKISS]

One key that you pigeons are overlooking- USADA/WADA/IOC have no jurisdiction or authority over professional boxing. So the fact that USADA even works for Floyd in his fights is a violation of US Congressional edicts (USADA only has authority over Olympics, Paralympics, and Pan American Games) and the IOC's own charter.

You keep copying and pasting the rules, regulations, etc of WADA or USADA... now show me where it says either has the authority to oversee Professional Boxing matches. All Arum is saying is- we'll do random, unlimited drug testing but it should be through a governing body that has actual authority over the fight like oh I don't know... the Nevada commission. This would be done with WADA oversight so it would be in league with their International anti-doping code.

I did this before and I didn't get an answer. I simplified the whole thing for the airheads having a hard time grasping a basic question:

Scenario 1: USADA conducts testing for a Professional Boxing Match.
Scenario 2: NSAC conducts testing for a Professional Boxing Match (With WADA/IOC oversight)

Question 1: What happens if a fighter in Scenario 1 refuses drug testing?
Question 2: Whatt happens if a fighter in Scenario 1 fails a drug test?

Once you answer those questions, replace Scenario 1 with Scenario 2 and answer them again.

Then tell me which scenario makes more sense or is more effective.

look at you, nephew.

funny how you scream and call about manny agreeing to this and that, but NOW USADA is in violation for even doing the testing?

you guys are terrible, nephew.

there is no other explanation for it

completely throwed.

[J-A-D-AKISS]

for princess

usada is able to do the testing because NSAC has no problem with them doing it

its part of a contract

The U.S. Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) is available to conduct its gold standard testing program on athletes who are training, competing or living in the United States. This testing is conducted under agreements with the relevant testing authority, which typically includes National Governing Bodies, International Federations, other National Anti-Doping Agencies, National Olympic Committees and the World Anti-Doping Agency. USADA testing complies with the World Anti-Doping (WADA) Code which works in conjunction with the International Standard for Testing.

[LupinIII]

I think the *******s have given up on these threads after being so unmercifully slaughtered for the last 3 days.

they will be back when bob gives them there next talking point

[Boxingtech718v2]

bla bla bla

[IMG]http://i1091.***********.com/albums/i383/kennyboy0707/didntreadfatguy.gif[/IMG]
You are trying to come up with so many IF, AND, OR, BUT, scenarios but they are just your opinion. Where are your facts? Where is your links and proof?

If two fighters sign a contract to test under USADA then that contract is binding. Any penalty for a failed test will be administered by the governing body, the contract stipulations , or/and the government where the violation occurred. USADA has the confidence of WADA, IOC, and US govenment that's good enough for me, obviously it isn't good for your *******s.