That's hilarious, suggesting the bigger picture. You're telling me Hauser and Montoya have a source that could implicate USADA as non-neutral, non-objective, and they choose to sit on it? It'd be the story of the decade. Forget FMJ, that kind of story would ripple throughout the sports world considering the legends that USADA has taken down, Bonds, Jones, Armstrong would be lawyered up in a minute's notice, demanding that any fines, convictions, or investigations be suspended in light of that fact. But we're supposed to believe USADA thinks GBP and FMJ are untouchable. laugh. my. a$$. off.
I dunno, but to quote f10mo$ "where there's smoke there's fire"
You have just proven that you are by labelling anyone not rushing to floyd or his promoters defence a pac turd, which as you know is a classic flowmo standard.
Calling someone a pac turd has nothing to do with me personally. Save the armchair psychology please.
Not in this case, since Hauser just recycled Montoya's schtick but protected himself by wording it more carefully as rumors. This is the same stuff that got Gabe hit with the legal equivalent of 'put up or shut up' and guess what? Gabe shutup.
Originally posted by Pullcounter
I dunno, but to quote f10mo$ "where there's smoke there's fire"
Not in this case, since Hauser just recycled Montoya's schtick but protected himself by wording it more carefully as rumors. This is the same stuff that got Gabe hit with the legal equivalent of 'put up or shut up' and guess what? Gabe shutup.
"Where there's smoke there's fire" is the ultimate trump card right out of the f10mo playbook , no amount of logic or evidence can beat it... it's like the Chewbacca defense
Reminds me of the Pac Circle Jerk move: No evidence of Pac using PEDs therefore he doesn't need to be tested, therefore no evidence of Pac using PEDs therefore he doesn't need to be tested, therefore no evidence of Pac using PEDs.
It's cute.
Originally posted by Pullcounter
"Where there's smoke there's fire" is the ultimate trump card right out of the f10mo playbook , no amount of logic or evidence can beat it... it's like the Chewbacca defense
Reminds me of the Pac Circle Jerk move: No evidence of Pac using PEDs therefore he doesn't need to be tested, therefore no evidence of Pac using PEDs therefore he doesn't need to be tested, therefore no evidence of Pac using PEDs.
No, because WADA isn't a testing agency, it's a governing body. Floyd didn't refuse, Arum was/is totally confused about the testing. WADA itself issued a notice telling Arum/TR/Pac that it doesn't do testing, that WADA recommends using USADA. Arum moved on to other excuses, and the Pac Circle Jerky Army did too.
Originally posted by josenoway
That's hilarious, suggesting the bigger picture. You're telling me Hauser and Montoya have a source that could implicate USADA as non-neutral, non-objective, and they choose to sit on it? It'd be the story of the decade. Forget FMJ, that kind of story would ripple throughout the sports world considering the legends that USADA has taken down, Bonds, Jones, Armstrong would be lawyered up in a minute's notice, demanding that any fines, convictions, or investigations be suspended in light of that fact. But we're supposed to believe USADA thinks GBP and FMJ are untouchable. laugh. my. a$$. off.
Originally posted by josenoway
Not in this case, since Hauser just recycled Montoya's schtick but protected himself by wording it more carefully as rumors. This is the same stuff that got Gabe hit with the legal equivalent of 'put up or shut up' and guess what? Gabe shutup.
Tweet
Comment