Should Champions get an Auto Rematch on losing their belt

[lfc19titles]

What do people think? I don't mean like after 1-2 fight champ but say someone has defended their belt 3 times. I think if they lose it after that, they should have the option of getting a rematch without being held to ransom by the other party? Maybe not 3 times say 5 defences even?

I think once terms are agreed then the organisations should make it mandatory for both parties to agree terms for a rematch if the champ loses

The rematch clause being optional for the losing champ of course incase the guy just does not want it

what do others think about it?

[vcvc]

no beacuse sometimes there are boring fights like wlad-haye

[lfc19titles]

no beacuse sometimes there are boring fights like wlad-haye

Which is why like the 5 defence belt rule would prevent it but in most cases, even if it is boring, surely a champ deserves the first shot at regaining his belt he lost

[junior gong]

Which is why like the 5 defence belt rule would prevent it but in most cases, even if it is boring, surely a champ deserves the first shot at regaining his belt he lost

Why? The guy would have lost, and in the meantime other fighters have been working their way into the number one position for their chance. If the fight is close or controversial, then maybe, but letting someone have a shot just because they have been there a long time seems a bit silly to me.