since when did pacmos start saying usada is dirty?

**Medved** · 07-09-2011, 09:05 AM

Not dirty but Biased since they handle americans. Besides, *****s wanted Olympic Style Testing. But now they want Olympic Style Testing not by Olympic Committe. USDA only handles US fighters domestically , WADA handles the whole world and has good reputation.

You guys are really screwing the pooch on this one, what other demands do you have? That Ellerbe is in the room when they "do the testing?"?

**Gino Ros** · 07-09-2011, 09:07 AM

Originally posted by Medved

Not dirty but Biased since they handle americans. Besides, *****s wanted Olympic Style Testing. But now they want Olympic Style Testing not by Olympic Committe. USDA only handles US fighters domestically , WADA handles the whole world and has good reputation.

You guys are really screwing the pooch on this one, what other demands do you have? That Ellerbe is in the room when they "do the testing?"?

WADA does not PERFORM testing , you dumbass.

**NanaSucka** · 07-09-2011, 09:11 AM

Originally posted by Medved

Not dirty but Biased since they handle americans. Besides, *****s wanted Olympic Style Testing. But now they want Olympic Style Testing not by Olympic Committe. USDA only handles US fighters domestically , WADA handles the whole world and has good reputation.

You guys are really screwing the pooch on this one, what other demands do you have? That Ellerbe is in the room when they "do the testing?"?

the fight is taking place in america so thats why usada is doing the testing. if the fight took place in a different country some one else would be doing the testing. they are all under the same umbrella so why ask for a change if not to wiggle out the fight. This is an individual sport not country vs coutry, backing one fighter doesn't help america in anyway. pac has shown he has more fans in america than floyd, anyway. espn calls floyd a coward, pac has hp, nike and other American companies as sponsors.

**ThatHaitiankid** · 07-09-2011, 09:11 AM

it wasent biased a few days ago but now it is lol

**LupinIII** · 07-09-2011, 09:16 AM

when bob told them to

**Leohappy** · 07-09-2011, 09:20 AM

arum really knows how to make an elephant out of a mouse. most boxers shrug this issue off without really trying, but for pac they have to make a whole campaign that even includes a defamation suit in the court. makes one wonder what the fudge is going on behind the scenes.

**junior gong** · 07-09-2011, 09:21 AM

Originally posted by negativeREP

the fight is taking place in america so thats why usada is doing the testing. if the fight took place in a different country some one else would be doing the testing. they are all under the same umbrella so why ask for a change if not to wiggle out the fight. This is an individual sport not country vs coutry, backing one fighter doesn't help america in anyway. pac has shown he has more fans in america than floyd, anyway. espn calls floyd a coward, pac has hp, nike and other American companies as sponsors.

You really havent got a clue how all this works have you?

'year year take da damn test, dat OLYMPIC STYLE TEST, year, das waddup all roads lead to da money mane, sheet'

***ing clown shoes!

**Medved** · 07-09-2011, 09:24 AM

Originally posted by negativeREP

the fight is taking place in america so thats why usada is doing the testing. if the fight took place in a different country some one else would be doing the testing. they are all under the same umbrella so why ask for a change if not to wiggle out the fight. This is an individual sport not country vs coutry, backing one fighter doesn't help america in anyway. pac has shown he has more fans in america than floyd, anyway. espn calls floyd a coward, pac has hp, nike and other American companies as sponsors.

It doesnt matter, Olympic Style Testing is not = USADA, it has to go thru WADA and they set it up. and USADA is not too clean

I keep reading how a lot of these Olympic athletes have never tested positive, and how USADA should get off their backs already. But one athlete reportedly testified to the grand jury that he used steroids, and some of the stuff he used was designed to fool the drug tests. Leaking grand jury testimony is deplorable. If USADA's people did that, they should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. I'm also troubled by how USADA has lessened the burden of proof to sanction an athlete, from a positive test to circumstantial evidence. There's an Oklahoma Land Run quality to USADA's prosecution. But now we're told you can take drugs and still pass the drug tests. So what do we do with that knowledge? How do you catch the people who do that? I've always assumed athletes want their sports to be clean.

rmstrong's attorneys say USADA's current offer is for riders to talk to federal investigator Jeff Novitzky, who could then give the information to USADA.

Presumably, the deal would only be worthwhile for riders who are still competing or young enough to return to competition if a ban was lifted.

"USADA is promising riders a sweetheart deal if they can produce anything harmful on Armstrong," Herman said. "A rider who has doped, they tell them, 'If you can finger Armstrong, we'll get out the eraser ... and everything is cool.'\u2009"

Herman said he could not disclose which rider or riders have been offered a deal. In the past Herman has said that, as a private entity, USADA's deal offer is similar to bribery.

One of the book’s revelations is Landis’ claim that his consultant, Paul Scott, heard from contacts inside the anti-doping community that USADA declined to pursue two strong cases of doping violations by American athletes in the fall of 2006.

hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

**Luilun** · 07-09-2011, 09:44 AM

Will they do random test for Xylocaine ?

since when did pacmos start saying usada is dirty?