Comments Thread For: Frank Warren Shreds Haye, Jabs Amir Khan Over Sky

[Sparked_1985]

look for him to take about Kell Brook, too.

If Kell can achieve any kind of success. And he really done nothing for Kell.

[lfc19titles]

That rant against Khan is just pathetic. That's just grasping at straws there. So does he support any British fighter or is he just an all around prick to his fellow countrymen?

Anyone and I mean anyone who had enough of this English Don King screwing them over left him, Haye left him but then embarrassed him in the press conference so Warren has been crapping all over Haye for a few years

Ricky Hatton left him so Warren did the same

Joe calzaghe left him so warren refused to pay him, he owes calzaghe around 2 Million pounds, calzaghe sued warren, then warren set up a european company saying he will pay from it then, then he applied for bankruptcy to once again screw over cazalghe, now calzaghe is still suing him to get his money from warren who has millions stashed away

Khan, left warren and now you see warren all over him with every chance

so many more examples as well

[edgarg]

That rant against Khan is just pathetic. That's just grasping at straws there. So does he support any British fighter or is he just an all around prick to his fellow countrymen?

I don't see any "rant" against Khan. I think his articles are well written and reasonable in tone. The point he made about Khan is actually VERY TRUE and, as a journalistic exercise, he would have been derelict in his work to have ignored it.

I see no bigotry nor raving in his article. Truthfully, I always look forward to his articles as I know they will be interesting, articulate and well written, with good language skills.

You critics are the bigots, illogical too. He's just writing an article containing fact and considered opinion, not killing your grandmother.

[edgarg]

I don't see any "rant" against Khan. I think his articles are well written and reasonable in tone. The point he made about Khan is actually VERY TRUE and, as a journalistic exercise, he would have been derelict in his work to have ignored it.

I see no bigotry nor raving in his article. Truthfully, I always look forward to his articles as I know they will be interesting, articulate and well written, with good language skills.

You critics are the bigots, illogical too. He's just writing an article containing fact and considered opinion, not killing your grandmother.

Khan showed himself to be really foolish in making his comment. He makes many foolish and ****** comments lately, demonstrating that he is merely an under-educated, not very bright, foolish, loose lipped, long tongued kid.

England, where I have hundreds of relatives and friends, which I used to admire and substantially invest in, turns out lots of anonymous en****** like him these days. If he wasn't boxing, he'd be working in a carwash or cleaning office buildings after hours.

Or driving a taxi like his managing director father. He was just lucky he had the boxing gift.

[vcvc]

shut the **** up you dumb piece of ****,

[iPhoneKiller]

I don't see any "rant" against Khan. I think his articles are well written and reasonable in tone. The point he made about Khan is actually VERY TRUE and, as a journalistic exercise, he would have been derelict in his work to have ignored it.

I see no bigotry nor raving in his article. Truthfully, I always look forward to his articles as I know they will be interesting, articulate and well written, with good language skills.

You critics are the bigots, illogical too. He's just writing an article containing fact and considered opinion, not killing your grandmother.

This article is fine, but Frank Warren only writes articles with an adenda, to put down fighters that aren't with him.

For example if Khan and his mother was growing weed, he would be all over it, but because it was his own fighter, Kevin Mitchell, he was more sympathetic and not as harsh.

Frank writes some good stuff at times, but you know that he is also a liar and can roughyl guess the way he will type according to who is on discussion.

He is a promoter who is good for British boxing, as he is bad for it.

[tennis-legend]

warren needs to die

he's worse than hitler

[edgarg]

Just to former fighters who have left him

He's like a jilted ex

It's in the nature of the boxing business that fighters sign with, and leave promoters, as there is always someone out there who dangles a better offer, and fighters are fighting now for money, not sportsmanship nor pride, nor to "put food on the table". They want to become CELEBRITIES. A new LOW for Boxing.

You guys should look up some facts. Warren brought most of those Champions to their ACTUAL Titles, and they only got big heads afterwards. For the things written and said about him by disgruntled fighters, writers or just people who don't like him, he has sued them all and won, (about 35 times) except for against Don King and Calzaghe. He made the highly reputable RANDOM HOUSE PUBLISHERS wirhdraw their biography of Ricky Hatton and pay him a fortune as damages. He also sued and WON against the law firm who'd handled one of his very few big legal defeats.

There things don't happen from nothing, like the rumours that half-brained posters repeat as if they were facts, instead of exaggerations and untruths. That the internet is anonymous doesn't encourage me to lie and fabricate like so many do. Facts are facts and truth is truth.

What the hell, a person must have respect for himself to be truthful and honourable, instead of making up imaginary impossibilities so that he can have his brief second of fame from the illiterate, anonymous, half witted internet masses.

[hayZ]

Frank Warren most bitter man in boxing.

[edgarg]

This article is fine, but Frank Warren only writes articles with an adenda, to put down fighters that aren't with him.

For example if Khan and his mother was growing weed, he would be all over it, but because it was his own fighter, Kevin Mitchell, he was more sympathetic and not as harsh.

Frank writes some good stuff at times, but you know that he is also a liar and can roughyl guess the way he will type according to who is on discussion.

He is a promoter who is good for British boxing, as he is bad for it.

Well, if he's writing an article with an AGENDA (I suppose that's what you meant) it's only natural to talk up the ****** behaviour of the subject. That's what journalists do, and HAVE to do to retain their public. And that's what most readers want to read.

Since The News of The World has just been closed we'll probably have a flood of illiterate sub-normals on this site-more than we already have- who will be looking for as much dirt as they can find, which is their usual glop, that they survive on.

So can we expect to see REAL dirt from now on?

That's the nature of a certain kind of animal, a kind that we here on BoxingScene know only too well.