Comments Thread For: Wladimir, Vitali Klitschko Would Like To Defend in Kiev
Collapse
-
-
so in your opinion, wladimir defeats vitali, were they ever to meet?Comment
-
-
" belts just gather dust ".....
They need to fight each other, there is nobody else.
Either that or Vitali should retire.
Wladimir has NOT unified the division.
He does not hold all of the titles.
Vitali should retire, Adamek would fight Arreola for the vacant belt, and Wlad could unify against the winner.
All who think that the WBC is " the best " of the 4 sanctioning bodies, remember this..... because NONE of the sanctioning bodies will recognise the other champions or consistantly enforce mandatories, ALL of them are ****..... because NONE of them could ever be definitive.
Disagree with me ?
Then explain why the WBC do not rank Wladdy in their top 10 at HW
Comment
-
They will never fight each other, so that one is done.They need to fight each other, there is nobody else.
Either that or Vitali should retire.
Wladimir has NOT unified the division.
He does not hold all of the titles.
Vitali should retire, Adamek would fight Arreola for the vacant belt, and Wlad could unify against the winner.
All who think that the WBC is " the best " of the 4 sanctioning bodies, remember this..... because NONE of the sanctioning bodies will recognise the other champions or consistantly enforce mandatories, ALL of them are ****..... because NONE of them could ever be definitive.
Disagree with me ?
Then explain why the WBC do not rank Wladdy in their top 10 at HW
Vitali will probably defend a few more times, retire next year and vacate. Then Wlad will unify and rule the division.Comment
-
Yes Vitali should retire.... but why should he, because you and I said so?They need to fight each other, there is nobody else.
Either that or Vitali should retire.
Wladimir has NOT unified the division.
He does not hold all of the titles.
Vitali should retire, Adamek would fight Arreola for the vacant belt, and Wlad could unify against the winner.
All who think that the WBC is " the best " of the 4 sanctioning bodies, remember this..... because NONE of the sanctioning bodies will recognise the other champions or consistantly enforce mandatories, ALL of them are ****..... because NONE of them could ever be definitive.
Disagree with me ?
Then explain why the WBC do not rank Wladdy in their top 10 at HW
1 - THE MAN need to live too you know.... would you walk away from fame and an "easy payday"?
2 - Wlad fights about twice a year... Vitali does the same... I say 4 Klitschko fights a year are better than 2!Comment
-
Wlad defeats Vitali because they are brothers and Wlad knows all the secret body aches of Vitali and is able to expose them.
Vitali knows the weak body parts of Wlad, too, but Wlad is younger, thus he has less of them.
However, my post was not about a h2h comparison, but r4r comparison.Comment
-
Cant argue with a single thing you said, but.....Yes Vitali should retire.... but why should he, because you and I said so?
1 - THE MAN need to live too you know.... would you walk away from fame and an "easy payday"?
2 - Wlad fights about twice a year... Vitali does the same... I say 4 Klitschko fights a year are better than 2!
..... they will be nothing but meaningless money fights, so dont expect me to crack a hernia trying to see them.
Good point, but at HW there is Vit and Wlad, and nothing else.
So I will not watch a K-bro fight someone else.
That would be like paying for Pacquiao/Margarito
Comment
-
Wlad will not have the physical advantages that make his very simple gameplan so effective. Vit is a bad, bad, man.Wlad defeats Vitali because they are brothers and Wlad knows all the secret body aches of Vitali and is able to expose them.
Vitali knows the weak body parts of Wlad, too, but Wlad is younger, thus he has less of them.
However, my post was not about a h2h comparison, but r4r comparison.
Wlad's style < Vit's intangibles, just mho.Comment


Comment