I have a hard time giving the jab credit when scoring a fight.

[Battle*Hardened]

I don't know why, but I just don't score it really when judging a fight. I take it into account, but usually much more with flush jabs that knock the head back. This is probably why I gave Haye 4 rds against Wlad. Almost 5.

[Spray_resistant]

I guess you have to compare it to what the non jabbing fighter is doing.

[ANDROIDISM.]

I don't know why, but I just don't score it really when judging a fight. I take it into account, but usually much more with flush jabs that knock the head back. This is probably why I gave Haye 4 rds against Wlad. Almost 5.

Five rounds, huh?

[Battle*Hardened]

Five rounds, huh?

I thought Haye won the first 3 rds, and the 12th. One on the middle was close, but I dont remember. Neither did much in the first 2 but I thought Haye did more, especially with going to the body a few times.

[-Antonio-]

Well scoring a jab is better than scoring nothing and a lot if not most of Haye's hayemakers were rolled or blocked.

[etlux]

you obviously don't know how to score fights then threadstarter. Ever heard of ring generalship? It's not all about punches.

[Heeb]

That would explain that scorecard because I can't see how Haye won more than 3 rounds.

[MindBat]

I was more impressed with the entire production. Can't top the Brits when it comes to a full-on promotion ...

[Manny#1ATG]

in all fairness I did give Haye 4 rounds, the rest was a boring and wholly forgettable fight...I have seen kids get knocked silly thinking they can just stick the jab on a shorter guy all night...every jab Wlad threw was flush enough...