Tweet
Dan, instead of focusing on the personal nature of this situation, lets deal with the facts that concern the two fighters.....
1.) Team Pacquiao gave a grand total of 7 different ridiculous excuses to justify why Manny would not undertake random blood tests without a 24-day cutoff..... which is absurd, because requiring 7 different excuses means that none of them were genuine.
Which one of those 7 ridiculous excuses did you believe ?
Come on man, you must have found one of those excuses to be reasonable, otherwise..... how could you possibly condone a needless action that killed the biggest fight in boxing history?
Plus, your answer will tell me exactly where you are at in terms of your honesty, and integrity, as well as your boxing knowledge.
Which one of those 7 ridiculous excuses did you believe ?
2.) You raised the subject of " investigative journalism ". When you did that, I assume that you meant, as opposed to reading some hogwash on the internet and running with it?
So, I want to know your personal opinion regarding the infamous "second" negotiations,..... you know, the one that took place without any of the parties concerned even meeting, let alone discussing any of the details
Lets find out who really reads hogwash off the internet and decides to run with it.
3.) I also want to hear your opinion on the following point in regards to the "lawsuit". You know, the legal action that Pacquiao initiated against Mayweather. The legal action that is absolutely unnecessary, completely blocking the fight, and would be completely redundant if Pacquiao took a harmless little blood test. The same test that Shane took, the same test that Mayweather took, the same test that Ortiz will take, and the same test that any other clean athlete would take.
Read the post below, and give me an honest assessment.
How does the Pacquiao " lawsuit " compare with Bob Arum's opinion regarding the lawsuit that was filed by the Collins family?
KEYWORD: " pathetic ".
This'll be interesting.....
And btw, if you need a link to prove that Arum made that comment, just ask
1.) Team Pacquiao gave a grand total of 7 different ridiculous excuses to justify why Manny would not undertake random blood tests without a 24-day cutoff..... which is absurd, because requiring 7 different excuses means that none of them were genuine.
Which one of those 7 ridiculous excuses did you believe ?
Come on man, you must have found one of those excuses to be reasonable, otherwise..... how could you possibly condone a needless action that killed the biggest fight in boxing history?
Plus, your answer will tell me exactly where you are at in terms of your honesty, and integrity, as well as your boxing knowledge.
Which one of those 7 ridiculous excuses did you believe ?
2.) You raised the subject of " investigative journalism ". When you did that, I assume that you meant, as opposed to reading some hogwash on the internet and running with it?
So, I want to know your personal opinion regarding the infamous "second" negotiations,..... you know, the one that took place without any of the parties concerned even meeting, let alone discussing any of the details
Lets find out who really reads hogwash off the internet and decides to run with it.
3.) I also want to hear your opinion on the following point in regards to the "lawsuit". You know, the legal action that Pacquiao initiated against Mayweather. The legal action that is absolutely unnecessary, completely blocking the fight, and would be completely redundant if Pacquiao took a harmless little blood test. The same test that Shane took, the same test that Mayweather took, the same test that Ortiz will take, and the same test that any other clean athlete would take.
Read the post below, and give me an honest assessment.
How does the Pacquiao " lawsuit " compare with Bob Arum's opinion regarding the lawsuit that was filed by the Collins family?
KEYWORD: " pathetic ".
This'll be interesting.....
And btw, if you need a link to prove that Arum made that comment, just ask
Originally posted by LeadUppercut
View Post
Comment