waiting in the court room still saying no to the random test and still hiding behind arum..bit.chquiao is a coward who fights at catch weight and people who don't have it anymore and his next pity fight is at catch weight again lol
Comments Thread For: Roach: If Mayweather Beats Ortiz, Pacquiao is Waiting
Collapse
-
Lead, obsessive/compulsive is the INABILITY to agree to disagree and leave it at that. NO ONE is going to win any argument...this **** has been going on for ages!!!! And MANY of the arguments on both sides will be destroyed if May and Pac fight. Everyone needs to give up the ***ing ghost!!!Comment
-
Both Pac and May have let egos get in the way and NO ONE WINS ANY argument on these boards. It has been an ENDLESS battle that has netted NOTHING but compulsive/obsessive behavior from Pac and May fans. If they never fight, are you going to spend the rest of your damn lives arguing about this???!!!!!!Comment
-
That's bull****. Manny said the reasons he lost were from the gloves, his socks and lastly from giving blood? How many excuses you need for losing a fight? Dude got beat, plain and simple. Pac won the second and third fight but he lost the first and after that loss. He made mad excuses. Why do you continue to try to debate that? We didn't know then if Pac could beat Morales in a rematch but rather saw him get beat in the first fight. His excuses are like Mosley saying the shoes he had f***'d his feet up or Haye saying he broke his lil toe. ALSO, fact of the matter is that Morales was drained and done in the 2nd and 3rd fights with Pac. Just like you feel Pac is justified in making excuses because he won the next two matches then Morales is justified because he lost them. The difference is. I don't remember Morales making excuses like Pac when he lost.Comment
-
Grustler - I dont give a sack flying ***ing **** if Pac said his hairstyle caused him to lose, the fact is he won the rematch and that is the bottom line. If a fighter said something bothered him and he lost and then he proves it by winning the rematch, he is CORRECT. Live with it or take Prozak.Comment
-
facts? what facts?
logic? what logic?
[IMG]http://i238.***********.com/albums/ff302/gingerslam/gifs/not-listening-dumb-and-dumber-o.gif[/IMG]
^ insert your favorite NSB *******Comment
-
Comment
-
Grustler - I dont give a sack flying ***ing **** if Pac said his hairstyle caused him to lose, the fact is he won the rematch and that is the bottom line. If a fighter said something bothered him and he lost and then he proves it by winning the rematch, he is CORRECT. Live with it or take Prozak.Comment
-
GR- WHO cares if Pac fought a weight drained Morales in 2 fights or Morales fought a Pac who was not his best? History shows Pac was the better of the 2. Your obsessive agenda is obviously one-sided and you cannot be objective. I, on the other hand have realized that both Pac and May were to blame when negotiations fell through and I can be properly objective.Last edited by richardt; 07-07-2011, 12:48 PM.Comment
-
how i'm i getting dismantled dumb ***.. when there was proven negotiations which team Floyd lied about..
g**** on being a dumb *****Comment
Comment