David Haye isn't a Puncher, he's a Punter

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Sharpharp
    Contender
    • Jan 2007
    • 140
    • 23
    • 0
    • 6,611

    #1

    David Haye isn't a Puncher, he's a Punter

    Come on guys, I and many others have said all along that David Haye was a sham. The hype was his only way of building up a fight which was only going to have one result.

    Every opponent he has faced before Klicth has pretty much been hand picked by his boxercise coach Adam Booth.

    I wouldn't be surprised that to haye its all about the money than the matchup. Think about it, in his last match against Fraudley, there were revelations of corruption when he bet lots of money on himself KO'ing Fraudley in the 3rd (which he did), so I wouldn't be surprised that Haye didn't have a plan for the Klitch fight. -Haye knew he couldn't beat him, so probably put a load of wonga on losing by decision....

    Haye, go away, your a disgrace to the sport, you can't fight for ****. You spent most of the rounds on the floor getting a breather for missing some pathetic telegraphed swinging punches, and cry like a baby with your broken toe excuses. Just like a broken record, go back to fighting hand-picked opponents that you and your entourage can place an easy punt on....
  • TriggerItch
    racist and proud
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Feb 2010
    • 200
    • 20
    • 19
    • 6,475

    #2
    if he was a sham he wouldn't have hurt klitschko, and he also would of been ko'd easily, he suprised alot of people with his slickness

    and although i think he loses to wlad 9 times outta 10, he is still a very good heavyweight and he showed it in that fight, probabley the best name on wlads resume

    Comment

    Working...
    TOP