oh that? i thought they were talking about his singing
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
*LATEST* Ring Magazine Cover DISSES Pacquiao
Collapse
-
-
-
Originally posted by comanick View PostI WOULD HAVE TO DISAGREE. aCTUALLY THE RING HAS BEEN PRO-PAC FOR A WHILE NOW. THATS WHYS HE'S BEEN ON THE COVER AT THE VERY LEAST 5 TIMES IN THE PAST YEAR. THEY ARE JUST CALLING IT LIKE THEY SEE IT. PAC HAS BEEN FIGHTING HAS BEENS FOR THE PAST YEAR. THIS IS THE TRUTH.
Comment
-
-
Funny coincidence-
The ring also did an article around the time the Marg fight was mentioned and the author basically said that pac and his team are going to cherry pick from here on and there is nothing we can do about it.
I cant remember what issue it was but when i get off i work i will go in my archives, scan it and post it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Alibata View PostYeah but now they got a mayweather fight to promote... Don't tell me Oscar has no control of what is written in Ring.
Again....there was no dissing on the editor's part against PAC. The RING mag for the most part has been a pro-Pac.
Comment
-
Originally posted by jrosales13 View PostSo you basically your classification for "down slide" is all you have to be is Pac opponent.
Good shit. Now take Pac out of the equation. What classifies as being on the "down slide"
For example B-Hop is not the same fighter. If Dawson beats B-Hop later this year. Would be beating some one that's on the "down slide" and even then should Dawson not get credit for it?
And, since you're talking about "gift decisions" please clarify what "gift decisions' to you?
Wow, so you actually believe Hatton beat Collazo and Cotto beat Clottey.... I can't take you seriously.
Comment
Comment