macklin robbed

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Terrel
    Fire and Blood
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • May 2010
    • 5054
    • 558
    • 603
    • 13,318

    #11
    Originally posted by wazaa.
    But Sturm is a ******, bro.


    FFS Wazaa!

    Comment

    • Medved
      Oh Mah Gawd!
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Aug 2010
      • 23633
      • 757
      • 323
      • 30,849

      #12
      Originally posted by ИATAS206
      anyone who scored that fight for Sturm doesn't know how to score fights he won no more than four rounds and that's being nice.

      One of the worst decisions I've ever seen in my life I'm tempted to put anyone who scored that fight for Sturm on my ignore list because CLEARLY they don't know jack **** about boxing!
      Another ****** post by another ****** poster.

      Sturm landed the cleaner and HARDER punches, he was hurting Macklin.

      Macklins punches were hitting air half the time, Rd11 Sky showed graphic with punches landed and it was like 139-131 for Macklin.

      You guys must not have eyes, You probably had Devon Alexander - Kotelnik 120-99 since you like to judge air punches.

      So lets see here.

      Cleaner punches + harder punches + Champion = WIN

      What robbery? It was a CLOSE FIGHT but the CHAMP always gets the nod, a 2 ROUND diff is not a robbery, Macklin blew his load early, even SKY had it as a DRAW.

      Comment

      • hent
        Banned
        • Jun 2011
        • 205
        • 33
        • 26
        • 261

        #13
        Sturm clearly won. 117-111

        It was no robbery, Macklin had no head movement and had no accuracy in his shots.
        Last edited by hent; 06-25-2011, 05:08 PM.

        Comment

        • Mikhnienko
          Lomachenko P4P#1
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • May 2009
          • 6056
          • 413
          • 473
          • 13,966

          #14
          Originally posted by ИATAS206
          anyone who scored that fight for Sturm doesn't know how to score fights he won no more than four rounds and that's being nice.

          One of the worst decisions I've ever seen in my life I'm tempted to put anyone who scored that fight for Sturm on my ignore list because CLEARLY they don't know jack **** about boxing!
          The British channel i saw it on showed the punch stats as 139-131 for Macklin after 11 rds so landed blows were very close and Sturm landed the cleaner harder shots throughout the fight...........Not sure what the hell you watched, even the brit ****riding commentator had it a draw which is what i had. You're losing it Natas

          Comment

          • Jim Tom
            Perfection Personified
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Mar 2010
            • 5301
            • 392
            • 103
            • 42,237

            #15
            Originally posted by robson24
            ridiculous decision what do you guys think?
            Macklin won by 2 rounds IMAO

            Comment

            • The Monk
              Secularist fo life!
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Feb 2007
              • 1893
              • 266
              • 414
              • 10,409

              #16
              Originally posted by Medved
              Another ****** post by another ****** poster.

              Sturm landed the cleaner and HARDER punches, he was hurting Macklin.

              Macklins punches were hitting air half the time, Rd11 Sky showed graphic with punches landed and it was like 139-131 for Macklin.

              You guys must not have eyes, You probably had Devon Alexander - Kotelnik 120-99 since you like to judge air punches.

              So lets see here.

              Cleaner punches + harder punches + Champion = WIN

              What robbery? It was a CLOSE FIGHT but the CHAMP always gets the nod, a 2 ROUND diff is not a robbery, Macklin blew his load early, even SKY had it as a DRAW.
              Is that you, Mr Ottke?

              Comment

              • Mikhnienko
                Lomachenko P4P#1
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • May 2009
                • 6056
                • 413
                • 473
                • 13,966

                #17
                Originally posted by Medved
                Another ****** post by another ****** poster.

                Sturm landed the cleaner and HARDER punches, he was hurting Macklin.

                Macklins punches were hitting air half the time, Rd11 Sky showed graphic with punches landed and it was like 139-131 for Macklin.

                You guys must not have eyes, You probably had Devon Alexander - Kotelnik 120-99 since you like to judge air punches.

                So lets see here.

                Cleaner punches + harder punches + Champion = WIN

                What robbery? It was a CLOSE FIGHT but the CHAMP always gets the nod, a 2 ROUND diff is not a robbery, Macklin blew his load early, even SKY had it as a DRAW.
                lol stole my punch count argument and got in before me, bastard

                Comment

                • The Monk
                  Secularist fo life!
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Feb 2007
                  • 1893
                  • 266
                  • 414
                  • 10,409

                  #18
                  Originally posted by hent
                  Sturm clearly won. 116-112

                  It was no robbery, Macklin had no head movement and had no accuracy in his shots.
                  Are you new to boxing? or just ******ed...

                  Comment

                  • shenmue
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Apr 2009
                    • 3790
                    • 687
                    • 2,099
                    • 20,662

                    #19
                    No robbery guys, Sturm landed by far the better harder shots, 7-5 in rounds to the German.

                    Comment

                    • ИATAS
                      Banned
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Jul 2007
                      • 36648
                      • 2,509
                      • 1,953
                      • 50,835

                      #20
                      Originally posted by Mikhnienko
                      The British channel i saw it on showed the punch stats as 139-131 for Macklin after 11 rds so landed blows were very close and Sturm landed the cleaner harder shots throughout the fight...........Not sure what the hell you watched, even the brit ****riding commentator had it a draw which is what i had. You're losing it Natas
                      lol you are ******ed my friend. All three of the commentators on Epix had macklin clearly winning. I don't need to see a punch ticker to know Macklin out worked and out landed sturm. clear win for macklin.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP