Should boxers be allowed to used any artificial means to overcome a physical handicap

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • tatangb45
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jun 2011
    • 1161
    • 32
    • 0
    • 7,254

    #31
    Originally posted by KillerStephen
    I suppose it really doesnt. But when the TS is asking in a vague manner to hide their obvious bias and agenda then yeah I think it matters a little.
    I still have to see any thread about either FMJ or Pac that is without bias. Some make valid points and some are outright dumb. We are here to discuss boxing and when the two sides have legitimate topics they do not agree on, it is just reasonable to have a civil debate in order that readers can make a decision as to which side has a stronger case.

    Comment

    • IMDAZED
      Fair but Firm
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • May 2006
      • 42644
      • 1,134
      • 1,770
      • 67,152

      #32
      What, like taking aspirin?

      Comment

      • tangalog2200
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Feb 2011
        • 3323
        • 81
        • 0
        • 13,904

        #33
        Originally posted by tatangb45
        To give an example: a boxer with stamina problems because of a physical condition, can he take energy drink or something that would help him overcome this problem?
        this is somewhat very complex......the big question is can we have boxing commissions that can really implement, monitor and regulate such "disability" corrections measures, drugs etc., etc?

        Comment

        • tangalog2200
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Feb 2011
          • 3323
          • 81
          • 0
          • 13,904

          #34
          Originally posted by tatangb45
          I still have to see any thread about either FMJ or Pac that is without bias. Some make valid points and some are outright dumb. We are here to discuss boxing and when the two sides have legitimate topics they do not agree on, it is just reasonable to have a civil debate in order that readers can make a decision as to which side has a stronger case.
          tatang....civil debate!!!! hundred per cent yes to that........

          Comment

          • tatangb45
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Jun 2011
            • 1161
            • 32
            • 0
            • 7,254

            #35
            Originally posted by tangalog2200
            this is somewhat very complex......the big question is can we have boxing commissions that can really implement, monitor and regulate such "disability" corrections measures, drugs etc., etc?
            I agree that this is a complex situation that is why it needs to be discuss and debated, not to come to a definitive resolution [although it would be nice if it can lead to that] but at least to show which side has the stronger case.

            Comment

            Working...
            TOP