The eye test
Collapse
-
-
I didn;t say he is probably not clean now. Stop reaching, I said he is clean once, it doesn't mean he is clean now. That is a fact. No one knows if he is clean now.
Can you confirm if Mayweather is clean now?
Yes or No.Comment
-
You're grasping at straws. If one of us is reaching here, it's not me. "Can you confirm it" is clearly reaching. Of course I can't confirm it. Just like you can't confirm he isn't.
But the fact that he's already tested clean once, works more in his favor, than it does against him.Comment
-
The man reaching was you, who did not quote me, but wrote and put words in my mouth. You were reaching.You're grasping at straws. If one of us is reaching here, it's not me. "Can you confirm it" is clearly reaching. Of course I can't confirm it. Just like you can't confirm he isn't.
But the fact that he's already tested clean once, works more in his favor, than it does against him.
As for me reaching, I am stating a fact, he could or could not be clean, whether he was clean once or not.
He spends more of his time not being tested than being tested. One test does show he did one test, which I commend, but I am not so thickle to believe that he is clean based on one test.
Glad you agree though, he could be a 'dirty' fighter. Thank you John, apart form your reaching, you were relatively good to talk to. Thank you for agreeing with me in the end that he could be a drug user also. As for asking 'Can you confirm it', it was a good question to you. I ask myself it too.Comment
-
What a crap thread. This idiot just keeps making **** thread after **** thread about exactly the same thing over and over and over. Doesnt being a total **** ever get boring?Comment
-
The "can you confirm it" is a ****** question. This is a discussion forum, based on opinions. If we only talked about what we could "confirm", there would never be anything to talk about.The man reaching was you, who did not quote me, but wrote and put words in my mouth. You were reaching.
As for me reaching, I am stating a fact, he could or could not be clean, whether he was clean once or not.
He spends more of his time not being tested than being tested. One test does show he did one test, which I commend, but I am not so thickle to believe that he is clean based on one test.
Glad you agree though, he could be a 'dirty' fighter. Thank you John, apart form your reaching, you were relatively good to talk to. Thank you for agreeing with me in the end that he could be a drug user also. As for asking 'Can you confirm it', it was a good question to you. I ask myself it too.
"Not to thickle to believe that he is clean based on one test". So I guess it would be correct to assume that you feel like every fighter who hasn't even taken one test, is dirty?
Also, "not to thickle to believe that he is clean based on one test", implies that you believe he is dirty. And that's something that you've said you didn't say, or believe. Try to contradict yourself a little more, please.
Usually when someone dismisses an argument, and declares themself the winner, it's because they've given up. Appreciate your surrender, kind sir.Comment
-
-
Comment