Comments Thread For: Floyd Mayweather's Fiance Takes a Shot at Pacquiao

[F l i c k e r]

I hope she was interviewed in the kitchen where she belongs.

lol, agreed.

[Pullcounter]

put a d1ck in her mouth and shut her whore ass up

nah... put a d!ck in her ass and shut her whore mouth up

[Pullcounter]

that shirt is sooo ****in ******... it only helps pac lawsuit against gayweather

[LeadUppercut]

The truth? Floyd can't handle the truth!

One of Mayweather's hardest fights is against the fast southpaw Zab Judah, who took the first four rounds of their fight (imo). Pacquiao is faster, has better stamina, a much better corner, and a better resume than Judah. Pacquiao is the bigger international star, the best pound for pound fighter in the world, has a Time magazine cover, was a serious contender for Time Man of the year, and he doesn't duck anybody.

Mayweather acts like a gangsta wannabe man child and needs the girl he's currently sticking to run her mouth for him.

Mayweather can't handle the truth!

I agree, Manny ducked Zab.

[ronnie_N.]

I agree, Manny ducked Zab.

zab ducking khan...

[wacksauce]

i have an honest question... is Floyd the only fighter in the history of combat sports to refuse a fight with someone because he assumed that the other fighter is using PEDs? I mean, I know there have been cases where a fighter accuses a potential opponent of using PEDs (ie Tyson on Holyfield, Pascal on Hopkins, Kozcheck on St. Pierre...), but i cant recall anyone ACTUALLY refusing to fight because of the issue...

just wonderin for real..

[LeadUppercut]

funny, this pretty much sums up your whole posting career on boxingscene.

You are a hypocrite of the highest order.

You Sir, are full of ****..... and a hypocrite yourself.

Why have you never replied to any of those..... " whine's " ?

Nice name btw.

IMO Pac's resume is that of a mid-top hof'er, culminating in wins against Morales, Solis, Barrera, and a loss to Marquez. Thats where it stops for me. Pac had his run, an excellent one, comparable at least, to two of the guys mentioned above, considering where Manny started..... and similar to many other elite fighters.

Thats where it ended for me, the Pacquiao who during the Marquez fight looked - according to the commentary team, and a number of writers/analysts - like he was starting to feel the effects of "too many wars" and was starting to look "faded", had a career which maps similarly to many superb fighters throughout history.

That is what would be expected from a terrific action fighter, a superb run through 3-4 divisions, and then the inevitable fade.

That is where the normality stopped for me.

I am not too sure about the " new " and " improved " Pacquiao, the one who - according to the commentors - looked "revitalised" against Diaz..... the one who put on 13lbs of muscle in 9 months while skipping through 3 divisions (WTF? )..... the one who will not take a random blood test.

I mean come on man, even aside from the abnormal late-career LEAP through 3 divisions all the while increasing speed and power, all of Pac's opponents since Marquez have been very carefully selected, and very well manipulated, except Hoya of course.

Even boxingscene.com recently asked Bob Arum why Pac's popularity continued to rise even though he was being heavily criticised by the media for his choice of opponent. Arum ducked the question of course.....
http://www.boxingscene.com/arum-talk...ey-more--39747

BTW, the easiest way to stop a " whine ", would be to discredit it.

Start here.....

Manny Pacquiao's last 7 opponents.....

Lately, a number of observers have commented that all of Manny Pacquiao's recent opponents have either been old, faded, or inept. Let's take a closer look at Pac's recent fights, and see if there is any truth to that allegation.....

Accusations leveled at Pacquiao include.....

* Manny will not fight a skilled boxer
* Manny will not fight a skilled counter-puncher
* Manny will not fight anybody who is in their prime
* Manny will not fight anybody who is on top of their game
* Manny will not fight anybody who is coming off a win
* Manny will not fight anybody without a distinct advantage

Let's apply that criteria to Manny's last 7 opponents, and see how they stack up.

====================================

David Diaz - Not a top fighter, faded, disadvantaged.....
* Manny will not fight a skilled boxer
* Manny will not fight a skilled counter-puncher
* Manny will not fight anybody who is in their prime
* Manny will not fight anybody who is on top of their game
* Manny will not fight anybody without a distinct advantage

Oscar De La Hoya - Shot, drained, and shrink-wrapped.....
* Manny will not fight anybody who is in their prime
* Manny will not fight anybody who is on top of their game
* Manny will not fight anybody without a distinct advantage

Ricky Hatton - Not a top fighter, faded, and disadvantaged.....
* Manny will not fight a skilled boxer
* Manny will not fight a skilled counter-puncher
* Manny will not fight anybody who is in their prime
* Manny will not fight anybody who is on top of their game
* Manny will not fight anybody without a distinct advantage

Miguel Angel Cotto - Badly faded / shopworn, and disadvantaged.....
* Manny will not fight anybody who is in their prime
* Manny will not fight anybody who is on top of their game
* Manny will not fight anybody who is coming off a win
* Manny will not fight anybody without a distinct advantage

Joshua Clottey - Not a top fighter, and strangely innocuous.....
* Manny will not fight a skilled boxer
* Manny will not fight a skilled counter-puncher
* Manny will not fight anybody who is on top of their game
* Manny will not fight anybody without a distinct advantage

Antonio Margarito - Not a top fighter, faded, disadvantaged.....
* Manny will not fight a skilled boxer
* Manny will not fight a skilled counter-puncher
* Manny will not fight anybody who is in their prime
* Manny will not fight anybody who is on top of their game
* Manny will not fight anybody without a distinct advantage

Shane Mosley - Faded, shopworn, and disadvantaged.....
* Manny will not fight anybody who is in their prime
* Manny will not fight anybody who is on top of their game
* Manny will not fight anybody who is coming off a win
* Manny will not fight anybody without a distinct advantage

====================================

All-in-all, that is a damn shabby line-up for a supposed P4P fighter, especially when you consider all of the advantages afforded to Pac during those fights..... e.g. fighting for a vacant JMW title, at catch-weight, against a welterweight BUM, and using 8oz gloves

Now, I can understand a top fighter taking the odd bout against a lesser opponent.....
but EVERY opponent in your last 7 fights?

How fkn lame is that ?

The last time Pacquiao fought a live dog was Marquez II, and according to a significant number of trainers/fighters/journalists/analysts..... HE LOST!!

SUMMARY: There is no question that Manny Pacquiao is a very carefully manufactured fighter with a padded resume'.

Sorry dude, I aint drinking the kool-aid, a good fighter will look great if he holds all of the advantages, and I am real damn curious about that whole..... "leaping through 3 divisions, increasing your speed and power, whilst refusing random blood tests"..... thing

[SirTomJones]

get in the kitchen biitch.

[LeadUppercut]

i have an honest question... is Floyd the only fighter in the history of combat sports to refuse a fight with someone because he assumed that the other fighter is using PEDs? I mean, I know there have been cases where a fighter accuses a potential opponent of using PEDs (ie Tyson on Holyfield, Pascal on Hopkins, Kozcheck on St. Pierre...), but i cant recall anyone ACTUALLY refusing to fight because of the issue...

just wonderin for real..

Hold on.....

Mayweather did not refuse anything.

He accepted 50/50.

He accepted the $10mil per-pound weight penalty.

That fight fell over because Manny would not submit to random blood tests without a 24-day cutoff.....
http://www.boxingscene.com/pacquiao-...day-cut--27427
http://www.mlive.com/mayweather/inde..._report_t.html

[wacksauce]

Hold on.....

Mayweather did not refuse anything.

He accepted 50/50.

He accepted the $10mil per-pound weight penalty.

That fight fell over because Manny would not submit to random blood tests without a 24-day cutoff.....
http://www.boxingscene.com/pacquiao-...day-cut--27427
http://www.mlive.com/mayweather/inde..._report_t.html

#1 what? of course he did... no matter how you slice it, Mayweather refused to fight Manny because he believes (or wants us to think that he believes) that Manny is on some sort of PED... now i'm gonna put it another way just for you buddy:

Pascal probably truly believes that Bhop is on steroids... Kozcheck probably believes that GSP is juicin'... and as we found out, Tyson was probably right about Holyfield being on PEDs... but my point is: they fought them anyway... isn't that what fighters do? I'd like to think that there's a certain type of pride... machismo of sorts, that separates great fighters from people like "us"... heck, i'd never fight a meathead... but hey that's me, i ain't a professional fighter.

Let's assume that Manny is on PEDs... is this version of him REALLY that scary? you said it yourself... his fights are specially designed to make him look good... and that his last 7 fights were against garbage opponents... so then... what's the big deal?