If it's a business move, I try to reason with fighters as much as I can, no matter who the fighter is, when it comes to business i'm far from biased. But when you are turning down your most lucrative fight, how can you defend that?
Cause sometimes, you cherrypick a fighter cause he'll get you more money than any other fighter, so you're not really cherrypicking the fighter, you're picking your biggest check which is the sensible thing to do and something a lot of fans still don't understand today, but there's no one out there available that will get Bradley a bigger check and a better challenge than Khan. Pacquiao is taken until 2012, Mayweather is on vacation and only rumored o fight Ortiz, and Bradley is not gonna go up to WW to fight Berto or Mosley is he? So Khan is the best fight out there in terms of money and challenge level.
Cause sometimes, you cherrypick a fighter cause he'll get you more money than any other fighter, so you're not really cherrypicking the fighter, you're picking your biggest check which is the sensible thing to do and something a lot of fans still don't understand today, but there's no one out there available that will get Bradley a bigger check and a better challenge than Khan. Pacquiao is taken until 2012, Mayweather is on vacation and only rumored o fight Ortiz, and Bradley is not gonna go up to WW to fight Berto or Mosley is he? So Khan is the best fight out there in terms of money and challenge level.
Comment