So if B-Hop beats Bad Chad.........
Collapse
-
Just saying he's 3rd fiddle in that generation as far as i'm concerned. And.............
He lost to a white boy after flappin them gums.
Aparently Joe was special. Just a protected daddy's boy made Hops feignt injury to try and rest up because Joe was in that ass.
Don't get upset. Everyone's all time fav has to take a hit. Hops is no different for you.Last edited by daggum; 05-28-2011, 12:41 PM.Comment
-
He should fight Cleverly and Cloud then he can not only say he won a recognized version of the title at his age but he unified the the entire LHW division. From a legacy point and a promotional point it just seems like common sense.
Fighting a guy who just lost to Pascal and brings nothing to the table and/or a SMW title holder in Bute or a MW in Martinez is less impressive whichever way you look at it.
Oh and daggum needs help for his obsession with Joe Calzaghe.Comment
-
He should fight Cleverly and Cloud then he can not only say he won a recognized version of the title at his age but he unified the the entire LHW division. From a legacy point and a promotional point it just seems like common sense.
Fighting a guy who just lost to Pascal and brings nothing to the table and/or a SMW title holder in Bute or a MW in Martinez is less impressive whichever way you look at it.
Oh and daggum needs help for his obsession with Joe Calzaghe.Comment
-
If B-Hop beats bad Chad,what does this do for his legacy??Beating the other 2 best fighters at 175 being 46.Will people still make up excuses to hate on his legitimate greatness??Because there isn't really any other record breaking things of late that I can honestly say would be more impressive.Comment
-
how is calzaghe vs calzaghe pathetic? you are pathetic for thinking anyone has a chance at beating calzaghe but calzaghe himself. just stop hating. some people like to think of fantasy match ups like calzaghe vs archie moore or calzaghe vs foreman but i already know he beats them so what's the point? he's undefeated and he refuses to lose. thus the only guy who is a challenge for calzaghe is calzaghe himself. you don't have anything about calzaghe in your profile which leads me to believe you don't like boxing or you are just being a contrarian and are pretending not to like him.Last edited by daggum; 05-28-2011, 01:15 PM.Comment
-
how is calzaghe vs calzaghe pathetic? you are pathetic for thinking anyone has a chance at beating calzaghe. just stop hating. some people like to think of fantasy match ups like calzaghe vs archie moore or calzaghe vs foreman but i already know he beats them so what's the point? he's undefeated and he refuses to lose. thus the only guy who is a challenge for calzaghe is calzaghe himself.
How about Sven Ottke vs Calzaghe?Comment
-
IMO, Froch is right in line with Dawson at this point.Comment
-
Comment