Originally posted by LeadUppercut
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Sergio Martinez: Mayweather Would Last, Pacquiao I'd KO
Collapse
-
Originally posted by PacquiaoATG View Postlol another dumb comment. Like Pacquiao had said he will fight Sergio at 150lbs just like he fought Margarito. Don't be ****** telling me Sergio was green 10 years ago, Margarito is 23 years old when he fought a 26 years old Martinez and Margarito has only 20-3 and Martinez is 16-0. Talking green is a ****** dimb excuses. Both of you dont know sh$t! You cant back up you none sense post.
You clearly know nothing at all about Martinez, and you clearly know nothing at all about boxing.
From your comments.....
I am absolutely positive that you have never even seen a Martinez fight.
I mean, what a ****head, how could you possibly compare Martinez to cheato?
Comment
-
Originally posted by MANIAC310 View Post.......
in boxing, age and boxing age are two different things you see Martinez was young at 26 boxing wise because he started boxing really late ..he wasn't bxong when he was 17 or 15 like Barrera and alot of other boxers ...
Comment
-
Originally posted by PacquiaoATG View Postlol another dumb comment. Like Pacquiao had said he will fight Sergio at 150lbs just like he fought Margarito. Don't be ****** telling me Sergio was green 10 years ago, Margarito is 23 years old when he fought a 26 years old Martinez and Margarito has only 20-3 and Martinez is 16-0. Talking green is a ****** dimb excuses. Both of you dont know sh$t! You cant back up you none sense post.
you're idiocy is depressing me ...
a boxers AGE isn't the same as his BOXING AGE do you understand?
Morales is 34 but hes WAAAAAAAAAAAAY OLDER than Martinez in boxing age..
Morales was boxing when he was a teenager and had been through many many wars..
Martinez started at 20 with no serious opposition until he was in his 30s ...
so in Boxing age he was young at 26...
what don't you understand?
Comment
-
Originally posted by puga View Postlol...are you just playin dumb or just being yourself...coz i dont see the diffrence....
With your childish little comments about how you " own " people
You are firing nothing but blanks kid.
So, where is this post of your huh ?
This amaaaazing post that I have ducked ?
Waiting.....
Comment
-
Originally posted by LeadUppercut View PostYou are an ignorant clown.
You clearly know nothing at all about Martinez, and you clearly know nothing at all about boxing.
From your comments.....
I am absolutely positive that you have never even seen a Martinez fight.
I mean, what a ****head, how could you possibly compare Martinez to cheato?
lol he call himself ****head who was posting some ****** comment in this thread. That backfire for good. lol ha ha ha. Go punch your keyboard.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by LeadUppercut View PostKid, stop being pig-ignorant.
Hatton was NEVER a top fighter, he had looked faded and shop-worn in his last few fights, he had a ridiculous camp, and had just had his clock cleaned by Mayweather..... he was a cracked egg and highly vulnerable, even Marquez would have KTFO Hatton.
Clottey is a totally inept BUM, it is a joke that you would even mention that clown, did you even watch that fight? Come on son, smarten up, Clottey rolled over, anyone can see that.
When Pacquiao fought Cotto, Miguel had just been destroyed by Margarito and then battered by Clottey. EVERY reputable trainer/reporter/analyst said that Cotto looked shop-worn and well-faded, and that he had been in too many wars.
Cotto was not on top of his game, he had begun to slide, he had no trainer to speak of, and was struggling with problems both in camp and at home relating to a family matter that affected his relationship with head trainer Evan Cotto.
Miguel was not on top of his game, and he most certainly was not in his prime..... plus, Pacquiao tried to drain him on the scales.
Listen to this reporter's take on the subject, shortly after the Clottey fight....
"I wasn’t exactly shocked to see Manny Pacquiao’s name being linked for a fight with Miguel Cotto after the Puerto Rican fighters disappointing performance last Saturday night against Joshua Clottey. As bad as Cotto looked in the fight, and believe me Cotto looked pretty awful, it seemed like a no brainer that Pacquiao would then select him as his next opponent.
But my question is why isn’t Pacquiao going after Shane Mosley or Paul Williams instead? Why the emphasis at fighting Cotto, when he was destroyed by Antonio Margarito last year? It seems to me the much better choice for Pacquiao would be to go after Mosley, since he beat Margarito a few months ago by a 9th round TKO.
Since Margarito has already stopped Cotto, the logical choice for Pacquiao to fight would be Mosley. That’s the bout that Pacquiao should be going after unless he wants to be considered a cherry picker."
Pacquiao saw that Cotto was ripe, so he jumped on him, but even the fact that Cotto had faded was not enough of an advantage for 27%..... so he demanded a catch-weight of 145lbs.
A catch-weight, for a title fight..... *** me, that is lame
Cotto of course, flatly refused. Miguel stated "147 if you want my title, but no-title if you need a catchweight". Of course, 27% demanded a catchweight and the title, it became a sticking point to get the fight made, so Cotto was forced to concede.
But even that was not enough for 27%, he demanded 143, even though his trainer Freddie Roach agreed to 144. Luckily for Miguel he stuck to his guns, or those cherry-picking ****s would have dragged him down to 143lbs.....
http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/275865
Catch-weights.....
There are only two reasons to demand a catch-weight.....
1.) you are not good enough to compete with your opponent at his natural weight
2.) you are attempting to drain your opponent to gain an unfair advantage
Pacquiao tried to drain Cotto, because Manny had already fought at 147.
The 143lb demand was an absolute joke, they really tried to do a number on Cotto. Just because the bullet missed, does not lessen the intent.
He fought Cotto, but why didn't he fought Mosley?
He fought Mosley, but why didn't he fought Marquez?
Now he's fighting Marquez, but why didn't he fought Martinez?
Beats Berto..... Andre is a Bumb !!
Beats Ortiz..... he was too young and perfect for Pacquiao !!
Beats Marquez....he was too old an perfect for Pacquiao !!
You said Hatton was NEVER a top fighter ?? But you mention Floyd's win over him. A victory out of his weight class of course.
Cotto was not on top of his game, but he was #3 in WW ranking.
You say:
"EVERY reputable trainer/reporter/analyst said that Cotto looked shop-worn and well-faded, and that he had been in too many wars."
But let me ask you this....In how many wars have Pacquiao been ??
A lot more than Cotto....of course!!
Marquez (2 times)....Barrera (2 times)....Morales (3 times) So WTF are you talking about ??
And of course... considering Pacquiao was the underdog in the Cotto fight.
Your are the same guy who says:
"Pacquiao must go down to 135 and fight Marquez.....and must go up to 154 and fight Martinez"
*****s can't even realize how ****** they look doing that.
Comment
-
Originally posted by LeadUppercut View PostYou are so full-of-**** kid
With your childish little comments about how you " own " people
You are firing nothing but blanks kid.
So, where is this post of your huh ?
This amaaaazing post that I have ducked ?
Waiting.....
Comment
-
All your excuses dont mean sh$t. Now go apply that to Pacquiao when you guys had said that Pacquioa has not taking any serious opponent. lol Anyway... Antonio Margarito beat the sh$t Sergio Martinez and has taken away his zero 0 lost... lol Dont worry a lost is part of life. Pacquiao has 3 lost. Mayweather scared lossing his 0 thats why he duck Margarito, Cotto, PacquiaoLast edited by PacquiaoATG; 05-26-2011, 01:34 AM.
Comment
Comment