Point well made.
To answer
1.Yes Calzaghe is better than Hopkins as he beat him. And beat at a time when as I said before experience was as equal as possible for both.
2. Any list is subjective, even ones that goes on and on. Actual fight result are the best way to judge which fighter is better than another. But offcourse there are exceptions like the ones you pointed out, Joe and Bernard are not one of them.
3.What deeper talent pool? America is well represented at the moment in pro boxing but no.1? On what grounds can you make that statement? Number of world champions, NO. Olympic Medals, NO. Highest purses, highest promotional expenditure most arrogant fans, YES.
To answer
1.Yes Calzaghe is better than Hopkins as he beat him. And beat at a time when as I said before experience was as equal as possible for both.
2. Any list is subjective, even ones that goes on and on. Actual fight result are the best way to judge which fighter is better than another. But offcourse there are exceptions like the ones you pointed out, Joe and Bernard are not one of them.
3.What deeper talent pool? America is well represented at the moment in pro boxing but no.1? On what grounds can you make that statement? Number of world champions, NO. Olympic Medals, NO. Highest purses, highest promotional expenditure most arrogant fans, YES.
Comment