Foreman by far!!! not to take away from what B-Hope did but Pascal to me is not a good fighter at all, he is a C+ fighter at best IMO! he was hyped up cause he beat Dawson on a off night in which Pascal was damn there got KO'd in that fight by Dawson. I expected Bernard to win but i did not expect Foreman to KO Moore at all.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Which was better: Foreman's KO of Moorer or Hopkins decision over Pascal?
Collapse
-
-
Foreman and it's not even close. It isn't even fair to say Hopkins because of how dominant Moorer was for the most part, Foreman knocked him out and Moorer> Pascal. Still, B-hop's win is impressive considering his age and the fact that he faced adversity getting hurt and stunned a few times, more hurt than we've ever seen too.
Comment
-
The significance of the title won is what separates the two for me and gives the nod to Foreman. Foreman's win (by KO) was for the undisputed heavyweight championship of the world. He beat the man who beat the man and in doing so, he won the biggest title in all of sports, or at least it still was at the time. Pascal, though a good fighter, was a champion who claimed a vacant title, and had been anointed "Champion" by the editorial board of a magazine.
Comment
-
Well Tunney, Pascal did more of the fouling so I'm not getting that. Fighting dirty will forever be a part of boxing. Just gotta accept that.
Comment
-
Originally posted by _Hisoka View PostWell Tunney, Pascal did more of the fouling so I'm not getting that. Fighting dirty will forever be a part of boxing. Just gotta accept that.
It was B-Hop's sneaky thumb to Pascal's eye that turned the fight in his favor. Up until that time, Pascal was doing well.
Comment
-
Comment