frankly I dont see how anyone whatsoever could think that Pascal would have won(unless via robbery) in the rematch, based on the fact that Hopkins dominated him down the stretch despite being caught and dropped twice....If people didnt see how flawed Pascal was before, youd think they would after the Hopkins fight...but people are weird like that.
Dont get me wrong, I give him credit, of course. But to me he already pretty clearly had a win over Pascal, so just getting a similiar win over the same guy isnt a huge bump in legacy to me personally. his overall legacy hasnt changed too much from their first fight, where I already gave him credit for a Pascal win.
I dont like Hopkins. But I have no doubt whatsoever that history is going to be VERY kind to him. And he is the best 40+ fighter of all time as well, only Archie Moore can rival him.
Dont get me wrong, I give him credit, of course. But to me he already pretty clearly had a win over Pascal, so just getting a similiar win over the same guy isnt a huge bump in legacy to me personally. his overall legacy hasnt changed too much from their first fight, where I already gave him credit for a Pascal win.
I dont like Hopkins. But I have no doubt whatsoever that history is going to be VERY kind to him. And he is the best 40+ fighter of all time as well, only Archie Moore can rival him.
Comment