i dont like leonard, but i'd have to go with him... he was probably the more complete fighter out of the 4(speed, power, chin, stamina, etc)
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Hearns,Leonard,Hagler,Duran(whosBetter)
Collapse
-
-
[[[DIDn't SRL beat all 3 of these guys? But for some reason i can't rank him above any of them]]]
============
For good reason. Leonard had a short career, only 40 fights. Duran was something like 72-1 when he fought Leonard the first time and whupped him bad. All have better title records than Leonard. Duran dominated the LW division, Hearns was the most multi division diversified, and Hagler dominated the middles.
Duran
Hagler
Hearns
Leonard
Comment
-
-
-
Originally posted by KidBlackie[[[DIDn't SRL beat all 3 of these guys? But for some reason i can't rank him above any of them]]]
============
For good reason. Leonard had a short career, only 40 fights. Duran was something like 72-1 when he fought Leonard the first time and whupped him bad. All have better title records than Leonard. Duran dominated the LW division, Hearns was the most multi division diversified, and Hagler dominated the middles.
Duran
Hagler
Hearns
Leonard
Comment
-
Leonard - Had the most success and beat all of the others
Hagler - He beat hearns and Duran and some say should have beat Ray!
Duran - Beat Leonard, gave Hagler a great close fight
Hearns - The most spetacular win, the KO of Duran but KO loses to the other two!
Comment
-
Duran
Leanord
Hagler
Hearns
Duran went up 2 weight classes beat srl, then at an advanced age goes up 2 more and is beating hagler after twelve rounds then beats and drops iran barkley, some hearns couldnt do in 2 fights, oh yea he's a lightweight, people talk like morales aint no real 135 fighter thats why he lost, duran going at it with with hagler and barkley at middleweight, little roberto duran top 5 fighter ever, rated higher then all them by ring magazine
Comment
Comment