Why won't Floyd just drop his demand?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Roja's480
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Dec 2010
    • 2133
    • 129
    • 129
    • 8,983

    #91
    but i thought pac agreed to the demands now you guys want floyd to drop the demands

    Comment

    • Roja's480
      Banned
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Dec 2010
      • 2133
      • 129
      • 129
      • 8,983

      #92
      Originally posted by pocket_rockets
      Coz, he says it weakens him if taken near a fight. Maybe true, maybe not. Unless theres no other way to prove whether or not he's on peds then we might not see the fight.

      If Floyd honestly believes Pac is on peds then Floyd might be on a disadvantage and if blood drawn near fight night really weakens Pac then Pac is on a disadvantage.

      The argument is, most of you believe and been saying that no way pac wins, why insist on the demand? Wouldn't the win be given more credit if you fought someone at his best condition, peds or no peds rather win over a blood drawn weakened Pac (which he has been vocal with) and Pac comes out clean?
      an excuse right there

      Comment

      • pocket_rockets
        Contender
        Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
        • May 2010
        • 177
        • 10
        • 0
        • 6,257

        #93
        Originally posted by (ROY)
        but i thought pac agreed to the demands now you guys want floyd to drop the demands
        Well, it wasn't very clear if he did.

        Comment

        • BoxingFollower
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Mar 2011
          • 3105
          • 144
          • 79
          • 9,390

          #94
          Originally posted by pocket_rockets
          Coz, he says it weakens him if taken near a fight. Maybe true, maybe not. Unless theres no other way to prove whether or not he's on peds then we might not see the fight.

          If Floyd honestly believes Pac is on peds then Floyd might be on a disadvantage and if blood drawn near fight night really weakens Pac then Pac is on a disadvantage.

          The argument is, most of you believe and been saying that no way pac wins, why insist on the demand? Wouldn't the win be given more credit if you fought someone at his best condition, peds or no peds rather win over a blood drawn weakened Pac (which he has been vocal with) and Pac comes out clean?
          I'll explain it to you this way.

          YES, the only reason why Manny has the smallest of chance at beating Floyd Mayweather is because of the PED's, he had no chance of beating Cotto without them, nor could he have beating Margarito or Clottey without them, he might have beaten Oscar anyway with our without them.

          The point now, is Floyd is trying to bring out the REAL Manny Pacquiao of 2005, he believes and many others also believe that without the roids Manny is still that guy of 2005 that use to get outbound and KO'd.

          Im not saying that Manny is on anything, but Im just saying thats how Anti-Manny fans and Floyd thinks of him.

          Look at it like this, Mayweather wants his best performance, there is no way Mayweather can KO Pacquiao of today, but Pacquiao of 2005 it is very possible, Mayweather easily TKO or Stops that Pacquiao. If they fight, Mayweather might only win by UD.

          In the end, Pacquiao should say to himself, I don't need steroids to beat Floyd, Im going to do it on my own.

          Comment

          • Bullrider
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • May 2011
            • 5328
            • 518
            • 137
            • 13,616

            #95
            Why won't fans just drop the fight and stop talking about it?

            Comment

            Working...
            TOP