Tweet
Don't buy into Frank Warren's lies, the best fighter that Warren ever got for Brook was Michael Jennings, and that was the reason why Kell left him. Khan was fast tracked (after his 1 round annihilation against that nobody Prescott) from a shot and faded Barrera, to the weakest champion at 140. Saying otherwise, just proves how much you've been brainwashed and the amount of bull**** you've been spoon fed. My advice to you, stop listening to other peoples opinions and formulate one of your own!
-
-
You've obviously not boxed before, either that or you've never watched Brook box. He does have good head movement and has very good footwork, is fast, accurate, powerful and above all, patient!
Your acting like Khan is something special, when he's shown many flaws in the past, weak punch resistance and very little variety being two amongst the many that he possesses. Khan's style is made for Brook (a natural counter puncher), as he jumps in (too often) attempts to wail away with yet more arm punches and his chin in the air, with that lax defence of his. This against Brook, would be a recipe for disaster.Comment
-
Brainwashed? What the hell are you talking about?
First of all, amongst all promoters, Warren is the most decent. Not saying much, but he doesn't make up stories out of thin air.
Secondly, its not lies, especially since Kell Brook's silence proves it was true. Kell Brook has a huge mouth, and he would deny these reports if false. KELL BROOK DUCKED COTTO, MIKE JONES, AND K9. FACT.
.
Warren has no reason to keep Kell Brook down. This truly an idiotic argument to make.
And finally, if he left Warren because he was unable to get him good fights, why is he fighting a 39 year old Lovemore? And don't you think you are a hypocrite and an idiot for saying Amir fought a shot Barrera, when Kell is fighting freaking 39 year old Lovemore? And again, if he moved from Warren to get bigger fights, why is he fighting this sham of a fight?
Amir legitamately won a world title at 22. And again, saying he was "fast tracked" is ***ing dumb. Even, if it is true, which it is not, he took the fight and WON. Just as he has won his subsequent fights. Kell has ducked ALL and ANY tough fights. And why are we suppossed to blame Khan for taking his opportunities? Such a dumb argument to take. And Khans rise as NOTHING to do with Kell ducking his opponents.
If you think Warren couldn't get him any tough fights, you're crazy. Warren is the most powerful promoter in the UK, and he has every incentive to make Kell big, so stop acting mentally handicapped and saying dumb stuff.
While Kell Brook hasn't done ANYTHING, hasn't tried to do ANYTHING.
Why does he keep on asking for a fight with Amir and Pacquiao if he isn't delusional? If Warren is lying why is his accusation that all Brook wanted was a fight with Pacquiao and Khan proven TRUE?
How delusional he is to think he can get a fight with Manny, or even Khan.
Nothing you say can disprove the fact, Kell Brook hasn't done ANYTHING. He is basically A BUM.Last edited by SpitBalla; 05-19-2011, 04:21 PM.Comment
-
Kinderlan was at the end of his career (33-34) and was only fighting Khan for a final pay-check. Getting a silver medal at the Olympics (second to the World championships), means very little in a practical sense in the pro game. The technical standards of the amateurs lags way behind the professionals, with no head guard to help Amir, he was knocked down on several occasions by lower level, blown up featherweights, with low K.O percentages. You can't deny that Khan has shown many weaknesses in the past, one that was exploited by a complete nobody, which highlighted Khan's amateurish flaws (defence and technique,etc). A prime Kinderlan destroys Khan!Comment
-
Warren has bad mouthed every high profile fighter who has left him in the past, it's widely known by everybody that has a clue about British boxing (well, perhaps not you).
Cooto and Bundrage didn't want the fight against Brook, down to the simple economic fact ("a thing that is known to be true" and not hearsay and supposition) that he's not a financial draw in America or England (yet). As for Mike Jones, he was fighting a rematch against an opponent that many had thought to have beaten him (and looking like **** in the process). So what was Brook supposed to do, fight yet more crap that Warren sends his way and not be ready for Jones (a good match up for Brook), or leave his contract with "old fisheyes" and improve the level of opponents?
As for Khan fighting creditable opponents on his way becoming a World champion, your either being purposely asinine or your ******ity knows no bounds. LOL!Comment
-
It doesnt matter if khan was fast-tracked, end of the day he was good enough to be fast-tracked, kell obviously isnt, he needs to win something before he starts calling out a world champ who isnt even in his division.Comment
-
Hey dip****, it's "you're" not "your". My god you are a dumb person. This isn't simply a spelling mistake. And it's ironic you're trying to insult me when you don't even understand the difference between the two words, my ******ed friend.
You can keep spewing nonsense, but Kell Brook ducked Cotto, K9, and Mike Jones, because he felt he should be fighting Manny Pacquiao and Amir Khan. The guy is deluded, and almost a big an idiot as you. And he is a coward.
And if this monkey Kell Brook thinks fighting a 39 year old Lovemore, who loses more than he wins now days, means anything he's almost as dumb as you.
And again, Amir Khan's success does not justify Brook's failure, so stop making ******ed irrelevant arguments. And yes Kotelnik was the rightful champion, he didn't win a vacated title, so once again stop embarrassing yourself.Comment
Comment