ESPN: Floyd with his excuse why his unwilling to fight Pacman
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
"Floyd Mayweather Jnr has suggested that he is currently unwilling to fight Manny Pacquiao because he feels it would be a no-win situation for him."
whats so hard to undersatnd about that dumb dumb...........the reason you have me on ignore is becuase youre sick of getting owned, dont even try...lolComment
-
That's an OPINION. You know, an OPINION of the writer of the article. Are you aware of what an OPINION is? My goodness. And what quotes show that he's suggested what the writer said?"Floyd Mayweather Jnr has suggested that he is currently unwilling to fight Manny Pacquiao because he feels it would be a no-win situation for him."
whats so hard to undersatnd about that dumb dumb...........the reason you have me on ignore is becuase youre sick of getting owned, dont even try...lolComment
-
Comment
-
You got it wrong buddy I don't agree with the article which is why I posted what I did. PBF is losing a PR for a good cause. I don't get how so many people can be like **** better drug testing and crucify the man who wants something that is a good thing. So my point will remain that PBF PR team is terrible because he is taking a public beating that he should not be taking. I will never be part of the crowd that disagrees with better drug testing. The **** that is going on is like everybody where you live at saying you scared of pvssy cause you wouldn't have sex with some pretty broad you didn't know cause its possible the b!tch got AIDS. When all you saying if the broad get a AIDS test I will blow her back out. But everyone telling you **** the AIDS test just go ahead **** her. HELL NO get a test is the right answer!!!!When did he suggest in ANY of those videos that he is unwilling to fight Manny? He's been a broken record for the last couple of years, "Take the tests, and we got a fight" These guys saw "ESPN" and jumped on it. They took one little quote and made a "story" out of it. When, he said much more than what they quoted him as saying. But again, no surprise here.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
Comment