Who won, froch or dirrell

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Biolink
    Donaire is #1
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Feb 2006
    • 9926
    • 642
    • 2,205
    • 40,170

    #21
    Dirrell won for me, but I can completely understand giving Froch the fight. Dirrell fought a dumb fight and waited too long to start turning it up, and it was a close fight up until that point. If you want to beat some guy in his hometown, you really have to lay it on him because he will get the benefit of the doubt most of the time.

    Comment

    • The Gambler1981
      Undisputed Champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • May 2008
      • 25961
      • 520
      • 774
      • 49,039

      #22
      I still see no reasoning for Froch winning based off what Froch actually did in the fight, complain about Dirrell all you want be he was clearly the more effective man in terms of putting effective punches on his opponent.

      Comment

      • Earl-Hickey
        Banned
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Nov 2009
        • 29031
        • 2,832
        • 1,384
        • 297,750

        #23
        Froch won, but it was damn close in an ugly, styles clash fight

        Comment

        • DiegoFuego
          Ask my dad, I'm GAY!
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Jan 2005
          • 17339
          • 1,403
          • 586
          • 24,657

          #24
          Dirrell won no less than 8 rounds

          Comment

          • Squizz
            Banned
            • Jun 2010
            • 1982
            • 87
            • 97
            • 2,133

            #25
            I had Dirrell winning 7-5 or 114-113 (due to the point deducted.) It was a terrible fight though. Let us never mention it again.

            Comment

            Working...
            TOP