Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Jean Pascal: I'll Take The Test, Why Can't Hopkins?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    Originally posted by IdNod4u2 View Post
    Yes I do. I want all boxers to take more stricter tests. I'm not so obsessed with one or two fighters that I blindly follow.

    Baseball had records that have stood for almost a century, others for half a century. A few guys come and just start breaking these records within a 5 -10 yrs span(MORE THAN ONCE) CMON!

    MLB turns a blind eye, for money and full stadiums. Then it gets ramped and starts to become obvious something is not right. (similar to how boxing fans are thinking some boxers might be using now because they are doing things never seen before) Thats when MLB got stricter. Boxing needs to do the same. Why would anyone be against this?... Pride? Mental Edge? Obsessed fans? Love for a boxer?

    Weigh what is a deeper issue.
    No one is against it.

    Wouldn't it be better to PETITION for it with the athletic commissions and governing bodies, rather than single someone out after you called him a cheater?

    I didn't see Pascal requesting these tests before the first fight, so why is it so important now?
    Last edited by Bee Keepz; 05-11-2011, 06:36 PM.

    Comment


    • #92
      Originally posted by IdNod4u2 View Post
      Yes I do. I want all boxers to take more stricter tests. I'm not so obsessed with one or two fighters that I blindly follow.

      Baseball had records that have stood for almost a century, others for half a century. A few guys come and just start breaking these records within a 5 -10 yrs span(MORE THAN ONCE) CMON!

      MLB turns a blind eye, for money and full stadiums. Then it gets ramped and starts to become obvious something is not right. (similar to how boxing fans are thinking some boxers might be using now because they are doing things never seen before) Thats when MLB got stricter. Boxing needs to do the same. Why would anyone be against this?... Pride? Mental Edge? Obsessed fans? Love for a boxer?

      Weigh what is a deeper issue.
      thats what i dont understand. IMO ost is a good thing for boxing and if you love boxing, how can you be against whats good for the sport?

      Comment


      • #93
        Originally posted by jbpanama View Post
        Pascal is a CHUMP, and soon to be Ex CHAMP!!!
        i agree jb, wait a minute, im actually agreeing with a jbpanama post? what on earth is in this coffee. LOL

        Comment


        • #94
          I don't think any fighter should determine drug testing policies, but this does make a lot of the same people who were hating on pacquiao look ******; because they are now claiming "nah hopkins shouldn't take the test", etc., etc.

          Comment


          • #95
            Originally posted by Bee Keepz View Post
            No one is against it.

            Wouldn't it be better to PETITION for it with the athletic commissions and governing bodies, rather than single someone out after you called him a cheater?

            I didn't see Pascal requesting these tests before the first fight, so why is it so important now?
            "NO one is against it"....Are you the representative of all? You killed it with that line. Ive seen many shoot down the testing on this site. But I wont beat a dead horse with Bull.

            Petitioning is also good. But the casual and hardcore fan know that the "attention" in boxing is paid to the names, hence, bring light to a fighter bring light to the game.

            Look at the attention, Sosa, McGuire and Bonds gave to MLB. I mean people who sere not even baseball fans were saying "steroids in baseball" Everyone was talking baseball.

            As for you timing statement...spare us all. "Its never a bad time to do the right thing".

            Comment


            • #96
              Originally posted by IdNod4u2 View Post
              "NO one is against it"....Are you the representative of all? You killed it with that line. Ive seen many shoot down the testing on this site. But I wont beat a dead horse with Bull.

              Petitioning is also good. But the casual and hardcore fan know that the "attention" in boxing is paid to the names, hence, bring light to a fighter bring light to the game.

              Look at the attention, Sosa, McGuire and Bonds gave to MLB. I mean people who sere not even baseball fans were saying "steroids in baseball" Everyone was talking baseball.

              As for you timing statement...spare us all. "Its never a bad time to do the right thing".


              So you feel, it's at a fighter's disposal on who should be tested and who shouldn't. Yeah, that makes sense.

              Comment


              • #97
                Originally posted by IdNod4u2 View Post
                Mental edge?...lmao YOU MUST BE A PAC FAN.

                I guess if BHOP takes the test He will be bowing down huh?
                Sometng like that.....DUMBO!!!

                Comment


                • #98
                  Originally posted by uglypug View Post
                  I don't think any fighter should determine drug testing policies, but this does make a lot of the same people who were hating on pacquiao look ******; because they are now claiming "nah hopkins shouldn't take the test", etc., etc.
                  There is a big difference for 1 Pac agreed to the test in the contract then he backed out, but in B-Hop case the contracts have all ready been sign why should he take a test when its not in the contract, they have to amend the contract. this is not the same as in Pac case ******

                  Comment


                  • #99
                    Originally posted by mrjoeblive View Post
                    thats what i dont understand. IMO ost is a good thing for boxing and if you love boxing, how can you be against whats good for the sport?
                    U obviously didn't take your SMART PILLS today....DUMBO!!!

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by johncods View Post
                      You already hear *****s making excuses for Hopkins not taking the test. Saying that Pascal should have requested before negotiations. So much for these *****s wanting a even playing field for Pascal. There's saying oh bernard is excused because pascal didn't ask before negotiations. meanwhile Bhop clearly said he ain't taking any test other than the commisions.
                      It sounds like you know full well what the accusations are and actually support Pascals stance. So since you want to bring up *****s and ****, why are you dogging out Hopkins for not wanting any part of the test but you don't have the same opinion about Mannys similar stance?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP