Manny's time could be a lot closer than we think.

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • shodown19
    Up and Comer
    • Jan 2009
    • 55
    • 6
    • 0
    • 6,229

    #41
    Considering that Mosley/Mora was a far more entertaining fight than Pac/Mosley leads me to believe that Pac is definitely on the decline. I'm not even going to bring Floyd into it, but I think a fighter like Zab Judah could touch Pac up nicely at this point.

    Comment

    • The Big Dunn
      Undisputed Champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Sep 2009
      • 69579
      • 9,687
      • 8,003
      • 287,568

      #42
      Originally posted by IronDanHamza
      This a very valid point.

      Floyd took 2 years off before and he was ok.

      Will he do it again? I'm 50-50.

      It doesn't matter how gifted you are, in your 30's you can't keep taking this amount of time off.

      Plus, Floyd outright relies in physcial attributes also. Losing them or them declining would effect him, badly.
      Only thing I'd add is floyd stays in relatively great shape outside the ring. He doesn't appear to have huge fluctuation in weight so maybe that contributes to his ability to stay on point after a long layoff.

      Comment

      • -MAKAVELLI-
        Banned
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Aug 2008
        • 50080
        • 3,580
        • 2,792
        • 169,000

        #43
        Originally posted by Chopper417
        Real bad comparison with Winky there bro considering Winky was NEVER fast at any point in his career.


        i was comparing Winky to Floyd, not PAC


        Winky was a fundamentally sound, texbook fighter whose defense allowed him to avoid punishment for much of his career...then when he took time off in the latter stages, he was never the same

        Comment

        • SERVILEV
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jul 2006
          • 1389
          • 39
          • 12
          • 8,514

          #44
          Originally posted by _Hisoka
          Just hear me out. Since the Margarito fight I've seen the decline. I went from actually being 50-50 in a possible Mayweather-Pacquiao fight, to slightly leaning towards Floyd to win, to now comfortably picking Floyd to win. The wear and tear, wars he's been in, the constant training camps he has to go through, the fact that he fights consistently, it's all gonna catch up to him...probably sooner than we think. So when it happens don't be shocked.

          He's wasting his time against now mediocre opponents, so he'll have himself to blame when it happens. It doesn't have to be Floyd to do it, it can very well be Ortiz or Timothy Bradley. Manny's the kind of fighter that can't afford to lose speed, or any sort of athletic ability. When he's unable to get into those weird angles, what then? Leg cramp or not, Mosley shouldn't have been able to make him miss that many times, Pacquiao should have gotten him out of there.
          did you just start watching boxing? Every fighter has flaws. Even Mayw..
          styles make fights. fighters WHO fight make fights. Mosley stayed stationary infront of Mayw, took huge bombs from Mayw, but never ran for his life like he did against Pacq.. Manny won the fight as just as easy against Mosley than Mayw did. Hell Pacq even knocked his ole butt down in the 3rd. Remember in those DANGER ROUNDS where Mosley might KO Pacq!! I fully expect Mayw to run for his life against Pacq aswell. He wont attack Pacq like he did Mosley!! and if he does....... Hes out..

          Comment

          • The Gambler1981
            Undisputed Champion
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • May 2008
            • 25961
            • 520
            • 774
            • 49,039

            #45
            Originally posted by -MAKAVELLI-
            i was comparing Winky to Floyd, not PAC


            Winky was a fundamentally sound, texbook fighter whose defense allowed him to avoid punishment for much of his career...then when he took time off in the latter stages, he was never the same
            Winky blew up though, if a guy stays in shape time off is not the same as if they let them self go~ look at some old fights while Winky was not fighting he was Super Size Winky you could tell even from a distance.

            Comment

            • Chopper417
              Interim Champion
              Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
              • Jan 2011
              • 723
              • 40
              • 0
              • 6,806

              #46
              Originally posted by -MAKAVELLI-
              i was comparing Winky to Floyd, not PAC


              Winky was a fundamentally sound, texbook fighter whose defense allowed him to avoid punishment for much of his career...then when he took time off in the latter stages, he was never the same

              Yeah I knew you were comparing Winky to Floyd. Technique wise I completely agree with you. I was saying that Winky never relied on speed because he never had it. He was never a particularly gifted fighter athletically, he just had strong technique and one of the best jabs in the business.

              Comment

              • -MAKAVELLI-
                Banned
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Aug 2008
                • 50080
                • 3,580
                • 2,792
                • 169,000

                #47
                Originally posted by The Gambler1981
                Winky blew up though, if a guy stays in shape time off is not the same as if they let them self go~ look at some old fights while Winky was not fighting he was Super Size Winky you could tell even from a distance.


                so you're saying that there's no chance that Floyd would be a few steps slower when he returns from his hiatus?

                that's the basic premise of my point...like i said before, he could be the same, or he could not be the same...i was refuting the opinions of some that it was not even a possibility

                and i used Winky as an example of even a textbook fighter that didn't need explosion and speed aging as a fighter due to inactivity and age

                Comment

                • -MAKAVELLI-
                  Banned
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Aug 2008
                  • 50080
                  • 3,580
                  • 2,792
                  • 169,000

                  #48
                  Originally posted by Chopper417
                  Yeah I knew you were comparing Winky to Floyd. Technique wise I completely agree with you. I was saying that Winky never relied on speed because he never had it. He was never a particularly gifted fighter athletically, he just had strong technique and one of the best jabs in the business.



                  exactly...as does Floyd...and moreso, besides his solid fundamentals, the tools that Floyd employs ie. the shoulder roll, the pull counter, the check hooks, the lead jab to the body, these are all weapons that not only rely on technique but reflex and timing...the first assets to go with inactivity and age

                  Comment

                  • Jim Tom
                    Perfection Personified
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Mar 2010
                    • 5301
                    • 392
                    • 103
                    • 42,237

                    #49
                    Originally posted by _Hisoka
                    Just hear me out. Since the Margarito fight I've seen the decline. I went from actually being 50-50 in a possible Mayweather-Pacquiao fight, to slightly leaning towards Floyd to win, to now comfortably picking Floyd to win. The wear and tear, wars he's been in, the constant training camps he has to go through, the fact that he fights consistently, it's all gonna catch up to him...probably sooner than we think. So when it happens don't be shocked.

                    He's wasting his time against now mediocre opponents, so he'll have himself to blame when it happens. It doesn't have to be Floyd to do it, it can very well be Ortiz or Timothy Bradley. Manny's the kind of fighter that can't afford to lose speed, or any sort of athletic ability. When he's unable to get into those weird angles, what then? Leg cramp or not, Mosley shouldn't have been able to make him miss that many times, Pacquiao should have gotten him out of there.
                    Even at his best Manny would never beat Mayweather.All he has to do is take the test

                    Comment

                    • The Gambler1981
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • May 2008
                      • 25961
                      • 520
                      • 774
                      • 49,039

                      #50
                      Originally posted by -MAKAVELLI-
                      so you're saying that there's no chance that Floyd would be a few steps slower when he returns from his hiatus?

                      that's the basic premise of my point...like i said before, he could be the same, or he could not be the same...i was refuting the opinions of some that it was not even a possibility

                      and i used Winky as an example of even a textbook fighter that didn't need explosion and speed aging as a fighter due to inactivity and age
                      Possible, but if a guy lets them self go really bad those chances are much greater.

                      I am saying Winky letting himself go was just as much of a factor as time, there were more factors involved than just activity and age.


                      That said no man can whoop father time, everyone fades over time.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP