Sidenote ; why is it that ass sore Pacquiao fans always bring up the judge's scorecard in the first Marquez fight, but don't bring up the fact that Pacquiao should've had a point taken away for hitting Marquez when he was down?
They even themselves out, so stop mentioning it. It was a draw.
The fact that the ref just stood out there and Marquez was still holding the rope to call it a knockdown.
Manny beat Marquez in the first fight.. i don't see how anyone can say differently... the judge even admitted he made a mistake, and if he did not make it..... it would of been a win for pac..
the second fight is the debatable one...
Well the judge made a technical mistake that does not mean he was correct scoring certain rounds for Manny and others for JMM. The judging in that fight was TOTALLY f'ed up. So many inconsistencies. If you haven't seen the official scorecards I suggest you do.
Sidenote ; why is it that ass sore Pacquiao fans always bring up the judge's scorecard in the first Marquez fight, but don't bring up the fact that Pacquiao should've had a point taken away for hitting Marquez when he was down?
They even themselves out, so stop mentioning it. It was a draw.
Originally posted by The_Bringer
The first fight was a draw. Could've been a Pacquiao win had the one judge not fudged the scoring on the first round. But it also could've been a Marquez win, had the referee rightfully deducted a point from Pacquiao for hitting Marquez when he was down.
And Marquez won the rematch.
can't give anymore green K but I completely agree...
the judges error in the first fight is only relevant if you think pacquiao won the first fight...which I don't and one of the judges agrees with me..
Tweet
Comment