I don't understand why you constantly try to point out Pacquiao's imperfections. It's a double edge sword if you're a Mayweather fan critiquing Pacquiao. If he KO's Mosley, then Mosley was too old. He dominates Mosley to a UD (same as Mayweather) while knocking him down in the 3rd (only 2nd man to do this), doesn't have an overly explosive performance, but nonetheless beats Mosley, yet he's doing more harm than good? It seems as if you're just pinning your hopes on the public totally alienating Pacquiao from receiving any type of notoriety, especially since Pacquiao's name is embedded in any talks dealing with the name Floyd Mayweather, and vice versa. Floyd's performance against Mosley wasn't anything to shine upon as an "epic win", let alone Floyd being rocked harder than he ever had in his career (though he weathered the storm and should be credited for).
Was this Pac's best performance? Not IMO, but is it going to hurt him and the sport itself? Highly unlikely. The biggest selling fight in history was a snooze fest, yet both guys still made Millions after. Pacquiao's going no where for a while.
Was this Pac's best performance? Not IMO, but is it going to hurt him and the sport itself? Highly unlikely. The biggest selling fight in history was a snooze fest, yet both guys still made Millions after. Pacquiao's going no where for a while.
Comment