I'm worried about something which stems from the Mayweather-Mosley testing.
I remember there being discussions at the time about how there was no testing sometime before the fight.
Does anyone know how many days it was? I think it was 2 or 3 weeks before the fight. When the testing team for some reason didn't carry out any further tests on either Floyd or Shane.
Now here's the problem. First I want to make clear that I'm a life-long Floyd fan. If he fights Pac I think it would be a comfortable Floyd win. And I'm not just saying this after last night. Example- see here from years ago http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/sh...92&post6665492
But I must admit, I'm concerned now about PEDs after last night.
The Mayweathers have said a lot about how dominance like Pacquiao's isn't possible without PEDs and roiding.
I haven't seen the fight yet, so I'm really worried about what a lot of people are saying today that Pac didn't dominate Mosley as well as Floyd did.
If a boxer can't perform like Pac does without PEDs and roids and then Floyd performs so much better, then I'm wondering: what might Floyd have been taking to have been so much more dominant against Shane?
People have mentioned a lot on this forum regarding the 14 day cut-off that it's inadequate as drugs can still be taken to enhance your performance during that period. Does anyone know what Floyd might have taken then during that gap when they didn't test? Could it have been some of that stuff?
I really don't want it to be true. I'm a Floyd fan and I can't comprehend him cheating. But then the Mayweathers live boxing, so they know more about boxing than me and anyone else here. So if they say a boxer needs drugs to perform like Pac does, then I'm worried when my boy Floyd performs even better than that.
I remember there being discussions at the time about how there was no testing sometime before the fight.
Does anyone know how many days it was? I think it was 2 or 3 weeks before the fight. When the testing team for some reason didn't carry out any further tests on either Floyd or Shane.
Now here's the problem. First I want to make clear that I'm a life-long Floyd fan. If he fights Pac I think it would be a comfortable Floyd win. And I'm not just saying this after last night. Example- see here from years ago http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/sh...92&post6665492
But I must admit, I'm concerned now about PEDs after last night.
The Mayweathers have said a lot about how dominance like Pacquiao's isn't possible without PEDs and roiding.
I haven't seen the fight yet, so I'm really worried about what a lot of people are saying today that Pac didn't dominate Mosley as well as Floyd did.
If a boxer can't perform like Pac does without PEDs and roids and then Floyd performs so much better, then I'm wondering: what might Floyd have been taking to have been so much more dominant against Shane?
People have mentioned a lot on this forum regarding the 14 day cut-off that it's inadequate as drugs can still be taken to enhance your performance during that period. Does anyone know what Floyd might have taken then during that gap when they didn't test? Could it have been some of that stuff?
I really don't want it to be true. I'm a Floyd fan and I can't comprehend him cheating. But then the Mayweathers live boxing, so they know more about boxing than me and anyone else here. So if they say a boxer needs drugs to perform like Pac does, then I'm worried when my boy Floyd performs even better than that.
Comment