What really ruined Camacho was the beating Rosario gave him even though Camacho won. He was never the same Camacho after that. Rosario psychologically damaged Camacho because after that fight he turned into more of a clown instead of the killer boxer he used to be. Camacho partied & did drugs but everyone knows that Chavez did as well so you can't use that excuse. Chavez was just a better, tougher boxer who knew how to cut the ring off perfectly, that and his brutal body attack was what did Camacho in that night. Chavez ducking Camacho? Don't make me laugh. It was said blah blah, by who......you? Camacho although a gifted fighter with lightning fast hands just wasn't in the same class as Chavez and Chavez would beat him 7 days out of the week & twice on Sunday. Chavez brutalized Rosario & mopped the floor with Camacho because he could walk through their punches but they couldn't handle his body work. I'm pretty sure that they pissed and **** out pure blood after they fought him.
But anyways getting back to Tito I think his best win over a future hall of famer in his prime was his beat down of Vargas. Now I'm not guaranteeing that Vargas will make it into the hall of fame but I think he might. I don't count his fights against Whitaker,Camacho,or Oscar because sweet pea was a shell of the shell that fought Oscar, Camacho was also clearly past it & he didn't beat Oscar so I can't count that one.
But anyways getting back to Tito I think his best win over a future hall of famer in his prime was his beat down of Vargas. Now I'm not guaranteeing that Vargas will make it into the hall of fame but I think he might. I don't count his fights against Whitaker,Camacho,or Oscar because sweet pea was a shell of the shell that fought Oscar, Camacho was also clearly past it & he didn't beat Oscar so I can't count that one.
Comment