Brits: Does a champ with 2 titles deserve more money than a champ with 1?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • withoutthee666
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Apr 2011
    • 1016
    • 54
    • 42
    • 1,240

    #31
    Bradley seems pretty popular with Khan's fans.

    That's what will matter.

    Comment

    • medium-deek
      Bet to Win
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Jun 2005
      • 5693
      • 517
      • 1,270
      • 14,752

      #32
      Khan should just agree to 50/50 but not a share of the UK revenue.

      Comment

      • Discipline
        Banned
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Apr 2011
        • 1330
        • 101
        • 15
        • 1,526

        #33
        Khan is seen as the future of boxing, Bradley is not - because he doesn't sell as much. Doesn't mean that Bradley can't beat Khan, because arguably he deffo will.

        HBO has strong ties with Goldenboy, and coupled with Gary Shaw - who wants a promoter extension - think they've both cornered Bradley financially, and made it seem like he's ducking when in fact he's not.

        Comment

        • Spacey1991
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Jan 2009
          • 8885
          • 247
          • 282
          • 18,684

          #34
          It should be 50/50 though but I dont know whats gone off or care, I speak for us all when I say we've all had our fair share of talking about purse splits lol.

          Comment

          • Squizz
            Banned
            • Jun 2010
            • 1982
            • 87
            • 97
            • 2,133

            #35
            Originally posted by jimbo87
            You spelt ******s wrong mate
            No, I didn't you ****** ****. That was intentional to get around the spell cursor that disallows profanity on here you ****** PHAGGOT. Better luck next time.

            Comment

            • Squizz
              Banned
              • Jun 2010
              • 1982
              • 87
              • 97
              • 2,133

              #36
              Originally posted by Spacey1991
              It should be 50/50 though but I dont know whats gone off or care, I speak for us all when I say we've all had our fair share of talking about purse splits lol.
              IT SHOULD BE 50/50 CASE CLOSED. Bradley has EVERY right in the world to refuse the fight otherwise.

              It's the same ****** LIMEY ****S who try to claim that RJJ "DUCKED" Joe Calzaghe because he wouldn't fight him IN ENGLAND for a 50/50 split.

              **** OFF. I HATE YOU ****** LIMEY ****S.

              I WISH YOU WOULD HAVE ALL BEEN SLAUGHTERED DURING WW2. SERIOUSLY. I WISH YOU WERE ALL SPEAKING GERMAN RIGHT NOW YOU DISRESPECTFUL PIECES OF TRASH.

              Comment

              • Trigg
                Jack The Stripper
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Apr 2010
                • 1478
                • 79
                • 3
                • 9,113

                #37
                Originally posted by Squizz
                No, I didn't you ****** ****. That was intentional to get around the spell cursor that disallows profanity on here you ****** PHAGGOT. Better luck next time.
                You've spelt ****** wrong again mate

                Comment

                • lfc19titles
                  Undisputed Champion
                  • Mar 2010
                  • 8732
                  • 725
                  • 628
                  • 94,838

                  #38
                  khan makes more money for golden boy and hbo than bradley does

                  he sells out arenas, he gets ppv buys in the uk while nobody wants to watch bradley

                  using the logic of champion is wrong as someone like mayweather who has no titles is a bigger draw than a champ like mosley was, see my point?

                  bradley is a ducking fraud, a total joke, was running his gob when khan was fighting someone else but when khan went for him, he ran away

                  Comment

                  • -Lowkey-
                    Winter is coming
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Dec 2008
                    • 3161
                    • 340
                    • 506
                    • 10,428

                    #39
                    Originally posted by Squizz
                    IT SHOULD BE 50/50 CASE CLOSED. Bradley has EVERY right in the world to refuse the fight otherwise.

                    It's the same ****** LIMEY ****S who try to claim that RJJ "DUCKED" Joe Calzaghe because he wouldn't fight him IN ENGLAND for a 50/50 split.

                    **** OFF. I HATE YOU ****** LIMEY ****S.

                    I WISH YOU WOULD HAVE ALL BEEN SLAUGHTERED DURING WW2. SERIOUSLY. I WISH YOU WERE ALL SPEAKING GERMAN RIGHT NOW YOU DISRESPECTFUL PIECES OF TRASH.
                    You are acting like a prepubescent little girl.

                    I might as well school your dumb ass on history Allied forces would have won WW2 regardless of if America joined in or not They barely engaged (in relative terms of course).

                    The major contribution made by Americans in WWII was in the Pacific against the Japanese. They didn't selflessly come to anyone's rescue but entered the war in self-defence after Pearl Harbour. The Soviets are the guys without whom all would have been lost. Britain was the country that entered the war to protect other countries.

                    What’s more Bradley is clearly ducking Khan
                    .

                    Comment

                    • Nonito Donaire
                      Banned
                      • Mar 2011
                      • 239
                      • 15
                      • 21
                      • 348

                      #40
                      Originally posted by MCCCXXXIII
                      You are acting like a prepubescent little girl.

                      I might as well school your dumb ass on history Allied forces would have won WW2 regardless of if America joined in or not They barely engaged (in relative terms of course).

                      The major contribution made by Americans in WWII was in the Pacific against the Japanese. They didn't selflessly come to anyone's rescue but entered the war in self-defence after Pearl Harbour. The Soviets are the guys without whom all would have been lost. Britain was the country that entered the war to protect other countries.

                      What’s more Bradley is clearly ducking Khan
                      .
                      haha, that b1tch gets owned in two threads.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP