Pacquiao-Marquez 2 where fought by two prime fighters, it maybe a hairline decision to you but still it's a win for Manny, just like what happened with Mayweather-Castillio 1, it's still a good win for Floyd. But with Floyd-Marquez fight, Juan was clearly fat, sluggish, slow as a turtle and was very uncomfortable in his first appearance at WW thus resulted in that 47%-12% punch accuracy... And Floyd came in 2 pounds over the contracted 144lbs catchweight, is that fair to you???
Which one is the better wins, Pac vs Marquez II or Floyd vs Marquez?
Collapse
-
-
Lets squash this Marquez was fat, out of shape etc...bull**** vs Floyd. That guy was strong and determined as ever, had he been fighting a less talented welterweight he probably could of won. Floyd is just that much better, did he not make Shane look worse than JMM? Or I guess Shane was Fat too? Always got an excuse to discredit Floyd u Tard, at leasr Floyd is a clean drug free fighter, bet u wish u could say that about Pacroid.Comment
-
Floyd had 1 catch weight fight and that was in favour of marquez it was only 2pound differrence and floyd had to pay him 300k per pound over,have all of mannys big fights have been catchweights and making fighters come down a whole weight devision prior to their last fights now tell me whose the *****? marquez comes in the ring about 145 anyway wen he was at lightweight so how can he be fat? floyd outclaseed marquez who beat pacman twice and marquez didnt even win a round while he won most of the rounds vs pacmanComment
-
agree on Floyd - JMM but Shane is with 5 losses and easily gassed out (probably because no roid in his system) old man... better see Shane kicking ass on May 7 (without the USADA). yo know what am talki'n bout?Lets squash this Marquez was fat, out of shape etc...bull**** vs Floyd. That guy was strong and determined as ever, had he been fighting a less talented welterweight he probably could of won. Floyd is just that much better, did he not make Shane look worse than JMM? Or I guess Shane was Fat too? Always got an excuse to discredit Floyd u Tard, at leasr Floyd is a clean drug free fighter, bet u wish u could say that about Pacroid.
Comment
-
exactly, thank you Marquez could come in between 141-144, as long as he was under 144 and over JWwFloyd had 1 catch weight fight and that was in favour of marquez it was only 2pound differrence and floyd had to pay him 300k per pound over,have all of mannys big fights have been catchweights and making fighters come down a whole weight devision prior to their last fights now tell me whose the *****? marquez comes in the ring about 145 anyway wen he was at lightweight so how can he be fat? floyd outclaseed marquez who beat pacman twice and marquez didnt even win a round while he won most of the rounds vs pacmanComment
-
I had Floyd Marquez scored 119-108 for Floyd
I had Pac-JMM scored 114-113 for Marquez
Floyds Win is clearly more impressiveComment
-
-
I'm a Floyd fan and I still say the Pac vs Marquez 2 win is more impressive based only on the the weight issue. However, Floyd still owns Marquez just as badly regardless of what weight they fought at, he lost one round at most and a lot of people had it scored a shut out. Secondly, that is the worst Marquez has ever and will ever get beaten in his entire career. he was rated #2 P4P at the time and was literally embarassed and made look like a complete amateur by Mayweather, regardless of the weight it was still impressive. that was one of the least competitive fights I have ever seen and Marquez is one of the elite fighters of our generation.
I SWEAR if Marquez and Pac fight again and it's at 147 and you ignorant ******* give him ANY credit if he wins you should all be f***ing shot. it's unreal how you fools give Floyd NO credit for that win yet want to see Pac vs Marquez next at 147.Comment
-
you do know he went up two divisions right?................Originally posted by grownfolk.usFloyd dominated Marquez him and Pac was close so the better win goes to Floyd, especially looking at where Marquez was ranked Pound 4 Pound at the time.
Comment
Comment