Comments Thread For: Khan: I've Agreed To Fight Bradley, We're Waiting on Tim!

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Rome-By-Ko
    The winner Is
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Mar 2009
    • 20157
    • 323
    • 332
    • 29,833

    #141
    Originally posted by J Dubb II 330
    and when dude was talking about Alexander and Campbell being more accomplished that Khan he is right, Alexander was the unified champ at 140, And Campbell was undisputed champ. Khan - WBA title, so there fore both boxers are more accomplished. And I'm not saying Campbell is better than Khan, he's not but it would be a good fight
    Campbell and Alexander(at the moment)are more accomplished then Khan..Although they may not be as talented then him..

    Comment

    • J Dubb II 330
      Call Me Nighthawk
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Dec 2009
      • 1916
      • 89
      • 93
      • 8,461

      #142
      Yup, no one is taking anything away from Khan, loads of talent, he is riding his talent through these fights, but talent alone won't win against Bradley. Khan is more talented than Alexander, Alexander is more skilled, imo

      Comment

      • punchmehard
        Banned
        Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
        • Nov 2010
        • 267
        • 7
        • 4
        • 324

        #143
        War Bradley... you gonna WIN even if you use the ROBOHEAD style or not. Expose that hype job Khan and blast him back to UK!!!

        Comment

        • jbpanama
          Big Floyd Fan
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Jan 2010
          • 8075
          • 107
          • 0
          • 20,919

          #144
          Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
          Did you read the part where it said they'd agreed the terms?
          Khan talks good....I look for him to PUNK OUT!!!
          To Avoid an Ass Whipping, Brads too Tough!!!

          Comment

          • Rome-By-Ko
            The winner Is
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Mar 2009
            • 20157
            • 323
            • 332
            • 29,833

            #145
            Originally posted by J Dubb II 330
            Yup, no one is taking anything away from Khan, loads of talent, he is riding his talent through these fights, but talent alone won't win against Bradley. Khan is more talented than Alexander, Alexander is more skilled, imo
            MMM I don't know bout Devon having more skills then Khan..Khan imo has skill because of Roach and he is more committed to what he does in the ring..Neither really make adjustments,I would say Khan(imo)is a better fighter then Devon..

            Comment

            • aznhybrid
              Interim Champion
              Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
              • Nov 2009
              • 687
              • 6
              • 1
              • 7,042

              #146
              So the first move is made.
              And everyone needs to calm down UNTIL the fight is actually signed. Saying who is gonna beat who aint gonna prove a damn thing except whos side your on. Both are accomplished fighters. Neither is a coward or anything of the sort.

              Comment

              • BetterCallSaul
                Shot!
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Dec 2007
                • 9026
                • 598
                • 681
                • 16,488

                #147
                Originally posted by romebyko
                Khan never fought a unified Champ(Alexander)and he never fought a very will and skill fighter like Peterson either..And be honest Abregu would be a nightmare for Khan..Hard hitting and boxing ability..
                I wasn't arguing that Khan has fought those kind of fighters. I freely admit Bradley has a better resume than Khan. However, as an all around, young, talented, and accomplished fighter, Khan is the best fighter Bradley can face at 140. He is largely recognised as the clear no2 behind Bradley, and is considered a very live, albeit slight underdog in this fight.

                I think it's fair to say that Khan is a cut above anyone Bradley has fought. And Bradley is.maybe a couple of cuts above anyone Khan has fought.

                Comment

                • Rome-By-Ko
                  The winner Is
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Mar 2009
                  • 20157
                  • 323
                  • 332
                  • 29,833

                  #148
                  Originally posted by timba
                  I wasn't arguing that Khan has fought those kind of fighters. I freely admit Bradley has a better resume than Khan. However, as an all around, young, talented, and accomplished fighter, Khan is the best fighter Bradley can face at 140. He is largely recognised as the clear no2 behind Bradley, and is considered a very live, albeit slight underdog in this fight.

                  I think it's fair to say that Khan is a cut above anyone Bradley has fought. And Bradley is.maybe a couple of cuts above anyone Khan has fought.
                  Talent wise I would agree Khan is a beast,but I never really seen him fight a fighter like Devon or Peterson..So it's kinda here say that Khan is better then those fighters without ever seeing any of umm in the ring together..But imo Khan is the best fighter Bradley's been in the ring,but I understood where the poster was coming from ya know..

                  Comment

                  • choelzle
                    Contender
                    • Apr 2010
                    • 216
                    • 13
                    • 21
                    • 6,289

                    #149
                    Originally posted by timba
                    I wasn't arguing that Khan has fought those kind of fighters. I freely admit Bradley has a better resume than Khan. However, as an all around, young, talented, and accomplished fighter, Khan is the best fighter Bradley can face at 140. He is largely recognised as the clear no2 behind Bradley, and is considered a very live, albeit slight underdog in this fight.

                    I think it's fair to say that Khan is a cut above anyone Bradley has fought. And Bradley is.maybe a couple of cuts above anyone Khan has fought.
                    No alexander is still number 2..They were 1 and 2 when they fought..someone had to lose...alexander is still 2 lol..Khan is 3 or 4..not sure what he's done to be ranked higher than peterson but i can live with 3 or 4

                    Comment

                    • Dirk Diggler UK
                      Deleted
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Jun 2008
                      • 48836
                      • 1,312
                      • 693
                      • 58,902

                      #150
                      Originally posted by choelzle
                      No alexander is still number 2..They were 1 and 2 when they fought..someone had to lose...alexander is still 2 lol..Khan is 3 or 4..not sure what he's done to be ranked higher than peterson but i can live with 3 or 4
                      Alexander has lost back to back fights in the minds of those who have eyes.

                      And what has Petersen done apart from not win his only significant fights?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP