Comments Thread For: Khan: I've Agreed To Fight Bradley, We're Waiting on Tim!

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • choelzle
    Contender
    • Apr 2010
    • 216
    • 13
    • 21
    • 6,289

    #71
    Originally posted by timba
    Name one fighter Bradley has fought who is better than Khan?

    Peterson? No
    Alexander? No
    Witter? No
    Abregu? No
    Holt? No
    Campbell? No

    Give credit where credit is due. Khan is far more accomplished than any boxer listed above.
    If you are saying that Khan is more accomplished than Alexander, Peterson and Nate Campbell than you aren't really looking at the fighters you are just bias and arguing for the guy you like lol...Being famous doesn't make you anaccomplished in boxing...The three guys i just listed have fought the very best fighters the sport has to offer....your guy beat Paul Mccloskey lol so....come on man

    Comment

    • leone24
      Contender
      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
      • Dec 2009
      • 149
      • 8
      • 5
      • 6,236

      #72
      ahhhhh light welterweight supremacy, khan got this hands down.

      Comment

      • choelzle
        Contender
        • Apr 2010
        • 216
        • 13
        • 21
        • 6,289

        #73
        Originally posted by timba
        Name one fighter Bradley has fought who is better than Khan?

        Peterson? No
        Alexander? No
        Witter? No
        Abregu? No
        Holt? No
        Campbell? No

        Give credit where credit is due. Khan is far more accomplished than any boxer listed above.
        And with all due respect when you use the word "accomplished" in reference to Khan at this point in his career you sound kind of ignorant...He is Literally the only junior welterweight who has not challenged himself and fought one of the sport's best lol so....get on boxrec and do a little research

        Comment

        • ChampBox@PR
          Team Cotto
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Apr 2010
          • 7531
          • 274
          • 172
          • 14,602

          #74
          Khan will Ud Bradley rather easily!!! 9-3 in rounds!!!!!

          Comment

          • wazaa.
            Banned
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Feb 2010
            • 13956
            • 773
            • 643
            • 15,658

            #75
            Originally posted by choelzle
            If you are saying that Khan is more accomplished than Alexander, Peterson and Nate Campbell than you aren't really looking at the fighters you are just bias and arguing for the guy you like lol...Being famous doesn't make you anaccomplished in boxing...The three guys i just listed have fought the very best fighters the sport has to offer....your guy beat Paul Mccloskey lol so....come on man
            [IMG]http://i186.***********.com/albums/x263/Blaze929/Forums/Chapelle-Show-03.jpg[/IMG]

            Comment

            • Dirk Diggler UK
              Deleted
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Jun 2008
              • 48836
              • 1,312
              • 693
              • 58,902

              #76
              Originally posted by choelzle
              If you are saying that Khan is more accomplished than Alexander, Peterson and Nate Campbell than you aren't really looking at the fighters you are just bias and arguing for the guy you like lol...Being famous doesn't make you anaccomplished in boxing...The three guys i just listed have fought the very best fighters the sport has to offer....your guy beat Paul Mccloskey lol so....come on man
              Have they? Alexander was a hype job who got exposed and outclassed by Kotelnik (who Khan virtually shut out btw). Who has Petersen beat? No one. And Nate Campbell is a *****, shot, old lightweight

              Comment

              • BetterCallSaul
                Shot!
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Dec 2007
                • 9026
                • 598
                • 681
                • 16,488

                #77
                Originally posted by LeadUppercut
                I agree, Tim shouldn't have to roll over for anyone at JWW.
                The same can be said for Khan. But sooner or later someone will have to roll over or there will be no fight. If we have got to the point where 'fans' would rather see a fight not happen just because someone has to accommodate someone else, then boxing is in a very sorry state indeed.

                I don't care is Khan makes 5% or 95%, I just want to see the fight get made.

                50-50 is fair split though.

                Comment

                • choelzle
                  Contender
                  • Apr 2010
                  • 216
                  • 13
                  • 21
                  • 6,289

                  #78
                  Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
                  Have they? Alexander was a hype job who got exposed and outclassed by Kotelnik (who Khan virtually shut out btw). Who has Petersen beat? No one. And Nate Campbell is a *****, shot, old lightweight
                  Alright then....I'll bet you 2 million that Khan loses again before Alexander does....

                  Comment

                  • leone24
                    Contender
                    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                    • Dec 2009
                    • 149
                    • 8
                    • 5
                    • 6,236

                    #79
                    Originally posted by choelzle
                    If you are saying that Khan is more accomplished than Alexander, Peterson and Nate Campbell than you aren't really looking at the fighters you are just bias and arguing for the guy you like lol...Being famous doesn't make you anaccomplished in boxing...The three guys i just listed have fought the very best fighters the sport has to offer....your guy beat Paul Mccloskey lol so....come on man
                    just look at your bias, and you say other's are bias. Khan put an a*s whooping on kotelnik like no other. Now i dont have to remind you what kotelnik did to alexander do i? So now i dont want to hear this bulls*it again that khan is not as accomplished as alexander.

                    Comment

                    • BetterCallSaul
                      Shot!
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Dec 2007
                      • 9026
                      • 598
                      • 681
                      • 16,488

                      #80
                      Originally posted by choelzle
                      And with all due respect when you use the word "accomplished" in reference to Khan at this point in his career you sound kind of ignorant...He is Literally the only junior welterweight who has not challenged himself and fought one of the sport's best lol so....get on boxrec and do a little research
                      Maidana - Top 5 JJW

                      Kotelnik - Top 5 JWW

                      Mallignaggi - Top contender

                      McCloskey - Top 10 JWW

                      Khan has fought and beat 4 top JWW's in his last 5 fights. Yes, he may not be as accomplished as Bradley, but to say he hasn't achieved anything of note in the sport is very ignorant of yourself, even hateful.

                      Khan has called Bradley out for a long time. Let's just hope he signs and money doesn't become an issue.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP