Remember when Ortiz vs Pacquiao was the fight to see at 140.

[Canelo Phresh]

I'm really not understanding WTF you're talking?



What is your point? Just what you trying to say without writing an essay.



Well obviously that wasn't the one point in time right?




Who's saying otherwise? That wasn't what ModernTalking was talking about. Again obviously this wasn't the one point in time right? Are you an F'ing idiot? do you not understand?



Who said this? There was a one point in time. Where if you said a super featherweight Pac was challenging lightweight Diaz. People would have been very happy with that news. Diaz was not over hyped like some idiots claim. There once was one point in time that he was a damn good fighter.

Obviously what you're stating with this selective time period is not the point in time you're talking about.

And, I don't think Me or ModernTalking said that Pac-Diaz was the fight to be made. He said it was a fight that he would had love to see. Some idiot said that Diaz was over-hyped. Which is a ridiculous statement and is why I answered that at one point in time that would of been a hell of a match up.

You're acting like ModernTalking or me is saying that Pac ducked/avoided Juan Diaz. Which we're not. We're not saying and we don't even believe that. I can't even believe I'm putting myself in the same sentence with ModernTalking because you have female tendencies and suck so much of Pac's **** that you get your panties in a bunch when another fighter gets named with Pac.

smh



LOL @ "Especially over Juan Diaz? *sigh* anyways what's your point? whatever it is, just make it and stop babbling so much.



Why would I think that? If I would have thought that, I would have mentioned 2009 as my time period. Hence why I stayed between late 2007/early 2008 period. Do you know how to read?



Not true, he fought and beat a couple of elite LWs. Again, this is something you would have known if you watched boxing before Dec 6, 2008.




What's your point?



No it's not the right call you F'ing idiot. If you do not know about the subject then don't put your 2 cents in it. You don't go to the type of run that Juan Diaz had by being a hype-job you moron. It's quite clearly that you just looking at boxrec because you wasn't watching boxing at the time. So you really don't know the top LWs Diaz beat. Maybe you should just STFU.

You made no points in this post, all you did was get your panties in a bunch cuz you ASSUMED that the point was Pac avoided Juan Diaz. Where nobody even came close to saying anything like that. And, you proceed to show your lack of boxing knowledge by insinuating that Juan Diaz was a hype-job. And, then went on to look at boxrec to see opponents and dates *sigh*

smh.

the ownage you just put forth warrants an Emmanuel Steward Awwwwww maa Gaaaaawwdddd

[straightleft]

I'm really not understanding WTF you're talking?



What is your point? Just what you trying to say without writing an essay.



Well obviously that wasn't the one point in time right?




Who's saying otherwise? That wasn't what ModernTalking was talking about. Again obviously this wasn't the one point in time right? Are you an F'ing idiot? do you not understand?



Who said this? There was a one point in time. Where if you said a super featherweight Pac was challenging lightweight Diaz. People would have been very happy with that news. Diaz was not over hyped like some idiots claim. There once was one point in time that he was a damn good fighter.

Obviously what you're stating with this selective time period is not the point in time you're talking about.

And, I don't think Me or ModernTalking said that Pac-Diaz was the fight to be made. He said it was a fight that he would had love to see. Some idiot said that Diaz was over-hyped. Which is a ridiculous statement and is why I answered that at one point in time that would of been a hell of a match up.

You're acting like ModernTalking or me is saying that Pac ducked/avoided Juan Diaz. Which we're not. We're not saying and we don't even believe that. I can't even believe I'm putting myself in the same sentence with ModernTalking because you have female tendencies and suck so much of Pac's **** that you get your panties in a bunch when another fighter gets named with Pac.

smh



LOL @ "Especially over Juan Diaz? *sigh* anyways what's your point? whatever it is, just make it and stop babbling so much.



Why would I think that? If I would have thought that, I would have mentioned 2009 as my time period. Hence why I stayed between late 2007/early 2008 period. Do you know how to read?



Not true, he fought and beat a couple of elite LWs. Again, this is something you would have known if you watched boxing before Dec 6, 2008.




What's your point?



No it's not the right call you F'ing idiot. If you do not know about the subject then don't put your 2 cents in it. You don't go to the type of run that Juan Diaz had by being a hype-job you moron. It's quite clearly that you just looking at boxrec because you wasn't watching boxing at the time. So you really don't know the top LWs Diaz beat. Maybe you should just STFU.

You made no points in this post, all you did was get your panties in a bunch cuz you ASSUMED that the point was Pac avoided Juan Diaz. Where nobody even came close to saying anything like that. And, you proceed to show your lack of boxing knowledge by insinuating that Juan Diaz was a hype-job. And, then went on to look at boxrec to see opponents and dates *sigh*

smh.

All I can say you frucking ******! You think you know everything? I stated you with the fact and you acted like an e-thug. You frucking ****** than the ***** here. My point is very clear and tried to blur it up **** genius!

[jrosales13]

All I can say you frucking ******! You think you know everything? I stated you with the fact and you acted like an e-thug. You frucking ****** than the ***** here. My point is very clear and tried to blur it up **** genius!

Yes you're right, your point is very clear. Your point is that you suck so much of Pac ****. That if anybody(like ModernTalking) says "I wanted to see Pac vs insert name. And, the fight didn't happen then that means that fighter is an automatic hype job. Right, that's your point?

I'm sorry that you started watching boxing after Dec 6, 2008 and is the reason why you're out of your dept in this discussion. Look at boxrec for dates and opponents is not going to help you.

[straightleft]

There was one point in time where Pacquiao vs Diaz was the fight to be made. Which one point in time tell me?

Starting from March 19, 2005 (vs Morales) up to March 15, 2008 (vs Marquez) Pac was fighting in Super Featherweight while at this time Juan Diaz, was already a lightweight since July 27, 2001. By the time Pac moved up for the first time to fight David Diaz at Lightweight in June 28, 2008, Juan Diaz already lost to Nate Campbell 3 months and 10 days ago in March 8, 2008. Pac would became a laughing stock if he fought Juan Diaz just after his lost to Campbell instead of fighting David Diaz. The fact that Juan Diaz just lost and just barely won by SD his next fight against Katsidis in Sept 6, 2008. You can't deny the fact, Pac vs Oscar at 147 in Dec 6, 2008 >>>> Pac vs J. Diaz at 135 in terms of money and legacy when I myself and most of the others didn't give Pac any chance of beating Oscar at 147 with just one fight at lightweight to boot. After the Oscar fight, J. Diaz next fight in February 28, 2009 he lose to Marquez. By saying "there was one point in time (you mean between (June 28, 2008 - Dec 6, 2008?) where Pacquiao vs J. Diaz was the fight to be made." Is laughable at his best. Now you tell me which point in time Pac vs Diaz was the fight to be made, genius? The dates I stated and the point in time when Diaz lost his big fights was clearly indicated the Pac vs J. Diaz can't be made.

LOL @ early 2008 Hatton being the best fight for Pac. Especially over Juan Diaz.

You think it's a good idea for Pac to fight J. Diaz after his lost to Marquez at 135 instead of Hatton at 140?

Again if you were watching boxing before Dec 6, 2008there is no way you would call Diaz a hype job.

From March 8, 2008 way down. The first time Juan Diaz fought an elite fighter he lose and from March 8, 2008 way up, his next BIG 5 fights he also lost those 3. He won against Paul Malignaggi but lose in the rematch and lose again to Marquez. So it's just right to call someone was a hype job if he can't compete at the highest level after he stepped up and fell apart.

[straightleft]

Yes you're right, your point is very clear. Your point is that you suck so much of Pac ****. That if anybody(like ModernTalking) says "I wanted to see Pac vs insert name. And, the fight didn't happen then that means that fighter is an automatic hype job. Right, that's your point?

I'm sorry that you started watching boxing after Dec 6, 2008 and is the reason why you're out of your dept in this discussion. Look at boxrec for dates and opponents is not going to help you.

You are worst than the *****s here and you acted like you know everything in boxing. You insulting everybody here and acting like you are knowledgeable than everybody here. ****diot!