Comments Thread For: Photo: Pacquiao's Target List Sends Mayweather a Message

[$Bullsfam$]

Ok I understand the first question but the following 2 are idiotic questions.

I mean it's not like Marquez arguably beat him twice or anything

[Pullcounter]

Hollywood, Ca. --- "MANNY'S TO DO LIST" --- Superstar Manny Pacquiao's list of past and maybe future opponents hang on his dressing room at the Wildcard Boxing Club in Hollywood. Pacquiao is in intense preparation for his upcoming World Welterweight mega fight against "Sugar" Shane Mosley on Saturday, May 7 at the MGM Grand in Las Vegas. Pacquiao vs Mosley is promoted by Top Rank in association with MP Promotions,Sugar Shane Mosley Promotions,Tecate and MGM Grand. The Pacquiao vs Mosley telecast will be available live on SHOWTIME Pay Per View. --Photo Credit/Chris Farina of Top Rank

[Click Here To Read More]

some of you mofos are so ****in dumb.

this is obviously a list made after the marg fight and before the mosley fight. whoever made the list is ****in with wifebeater and *****s.

[Ryannn]

Only to the casual fan does that look like an impressive list, but to the keen eye its merely a mediocre one that leaves many questions.

ledwaba- pac was a big underdog, first fight in america, supposed to be a look good fight for ledwaba. he dominated.

barrera- coming off victories over naz and morales. p4p'er, pac was supposed to get clobbered. pac dominated. barrera went on a win streak after that.

marquez- close fight, 3 kd's in the first round, marquez won the majority of the rounds, controversial draw. second fight, another close fight, pac edged him

diaz- worst name on the list, but still a title holder at 135. pac's first fight at that weight, pac dominated.

dlh- asked pac to go up 2 weight class (actually, 3 as pac just had his first fight at 135), was supposed to be a circus fight. pac made the ****** quit.

hatton- lineal champ at 140. ktfo in 2 rounds. made him the first guy to win 4 lineal titles in 4 weight class. IN HISTORY

cotto- catchweight 145 lbs, but was a non factor. cotto shows he still has it despite having lost to margarito. he got dominated, but went to 154 and grabbed a belt.

clottey- solid ww. first defense at full ww. it was a shutout

margarito- coming of suspension, but the is much bigger than pac. pac dominated

no matter how much you downplay his resume, it is one of the best right now.

calling it unimpressive is ******ed.

[jrosales13]

I mean it's not like Marquez arguably beat him twice or anything

OK and?

Arguably Pac beat JMM twice right? And, technically he drew once and won once right?

So therefor one can say team Pac feels they won the fight and rightfully so since it was close enough that could have gone either way and they technically got the decision. But, if they feel they won, why not cross his name out the list?

So again, I don't get the question that letsgobrady was asking. Now maybe you can explain it to me.

Or are you just going to respond again with "but JMM arguably won the fight "

[Ryannn]

I mean it's not like Marquez arguably beat him twice or anything

he had a draw and a loss in two close fights.

point is, he LOST

[$Bullsfam$]

OK and?

Arguably Pac beat JMM twice right? And, technically he drew once and won once right?

So therefor one can say team Pac feels they won the fight and rightfully so since it was close enough that could have gone either way and they technically got the decision. But, if they feel they won, why not cross his name out the list?

So again, I don't get the question that letsgobrady was asking. Now maybe you can explain it to me.

Or are you just going to respond again with "but JMM arguably won the fight "

Nope. I'm just saying, obviously their's controversy around both fights why would it be an idiotic statement to question whether his name should really be crossed out?

[Ryannn]

Nope. I'm just saying, obviously their's controversy around both fights why would it be an idiotic statement to question whether his name should really be crossed out?

its a list of people he beat.

just because it was close doesn't mean it shouldn't count

[jrosales13]

Nope. I'm just saying, obviously their's controversy around both fights why would it be an idiotic statement to question whether his name should really be crossed out?

Because, not only did Pac technically win, not only does he have a case that he deserve to win, but it's team Pac list and they felt they won. So why not cross him out? Maybe they don't feel it's a controversy? I don't feel it was a controversy. I had Pac winning. I don't think it was a robbery at all. Was it close enough that it could have gone to JMM? Sure. But, a robbery no. So if they felt they won and they technically did the got the decision and decided to cross the name out. Then WTF is the problem?

If it was a robbery, then yes I would understand that question. But, even if you had JMM winning you can't call that fight a robbery. Unless you completely bias. So to ask that question because to ask that question on why team Pac would cross his name out is completely idiotic.

Unless you actually make a point on why it wouldn't be? Or is that your point? That JMM arguably won therefor team Pac shouldn't him out even though they probably they won and technically got the decision?

[bluetuazon]

and the words "catchweight king" on top of the list too

the guyin ur avatar fought at a catchweight a week ago and thats for the championship belt.......smh

[flint]

how the hell does he expect to fight mayweather since he want do the testing. ****** to have mayweather's name on that list. it does'nt mean anything.