Okay cut the crap about Pac fighting only boxers coming off a lost

[dc3383]

The facts don't lie. Pac fought every ranked fighter in WW. Who else in WW would you have rather Pac fought?

If you say Berto, too bad he couldn't stay on top long enough to get his chance.

Maybe you haven't noticed buts it not Nov 2009 and when he fought them none of them was in that same spot.

[azumi]

i don't think there is a boxer out there that's on top who doesn't have a manager that doesn't cherry pick. I don't care how awesome an up coming fighter is if he isn't gonna bring in as much money as an over the hill boring fighter he's not gonna get the contract. they would much rather wait on that up and coming fighter to mature not in skill but in sales.
fighter take risk fights mostly on the way up the ranks not when there at their peak.

why would barrera and morales continue to fight each other several times when marquez was floating around the ranks?

[empiricix]

Maybe you haven't noticed buts it not Nov 2009 and when he fought them none of them was in that same spot.

Well, can you name the five WWs today who took their place in the division rankings?

[Gutz]

He had choices of Berto, Bradley, JMM but ends up fighting a guy that has lost 2 and drawn 1 of his last 5 fights.

LOL if Pac would have fought any of those guys..


They would say he is cherry picking too..



Mayweather or Martinez are the only choices for Pac .... Everyone else is cherry picking..

[brick wall]

the clottey and margarito that pac fought and the shane he's about to fight are mediocre matchups only if you put pac in a higher standard...only if you think he's a great fighter. ironically, the people ****ting on these fights are the same people who are tirelessly trying to malign pac's career and success. it's all about their bull**** agenda. put those 3 fighters against any other welterweights and they will instanly become legit opponents.