Comments Thread For: Lewkowicz Reponds To Panama Commission's Decision

[BIGPOPPAPUMP]

On the surface, the accusations leveled against prominent boxing representative Sampson Lewkowicz seem substantive, but as the true story is told, as set forth below, it is nothing more than the story of a powerless third-world boxing commission being corrupted and influenced by a greedy television executive.

[Click Here To Read More]

[Nyboxfan1]

Panama boxing commissions = corrupt

[edgarg]

On the surface, the accusations leveled against prominent boxing representative Sampson Lewkowicz seem substantive, but as the true story is told, as set forth below, it is nothing more than the story of a powerless third-world boxing commission being corrupted and influenced by a greedy television executive.

[Click Here To Read More]

I live I Panama, and although I don't know that the Boxing Commission is corrupt, I do know that there is much corruption here in many aspects of this otherwise beautiful country.

However, I regard Sampson's letter as an almost overt threat, and a definite denigration of the guy he's writing to, trying to "make evidence" in writing by pointing out that he may be regarding Anselmo's future as insignificant compared to his "other" involvements, and basically pointing out in a threatening way the penalties that may be facing Jacques for not knowing enough about his business, such as consulting the Commission (which incidentally he is accusing of being corrupt, and susceptible to blackmail)

This is a commonplace trick often resorted to by unscrupulous litigators, that of "manufacturing" evidence "on the ground" so as to be able to produce it in a court of Law if neccessary.

I notice that he didn't do something which, if the intent was legitimate, he would have been certain to have done. That is, to repeat the dates of every previous communication he had had with Jacques on this same subject.

In THIS case it is VERY transparent that this is what he is trying to do.

Just my opinion. No charge.

By the way, for a guy in Sampson's position, his spelling is atrocious, "Bussiness" for "business" ....."loosing" for "losing" and a few others I can't remember now. He writes whole, long, involved sentences, with no punctuation, in fact his whole letter shows a remarkable lack of ability for writing an important letter altogether.

[Nyboxfan1]

LOL The spell check must've been broken that day